Teams

GSTL40/Swartling/Grande Dunes

2023 Adult 40 & Over - GSTL · Adult Women 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-05-03vs GSTL40/Hale/PrestwickWon 10
W#1 DoublesDiana Morgan / Deanne Johnson Stephens vs Kimberly Hale / Katherine Smith6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2023-04-26vs GSTL40/Core/SurfWon 10
W#3 DoublesDeanne Johnson Stephens / Diana Morgan vs Shannon Fries / Cameron Roy6-3, 7-5
2023-03-25vs GSTL40/Wilcox/StablesLost 01
L#1 DoublesDeanne Johnson Stephens / Diana Morgan vs Erin Angner / Tara Crammer3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-03-15vs GSTL40/Core/SurfLost 01
L#1 DoublesDiana Morgan / Leslie Thomas vs Tonya Fitzgerald / Cheryl Rex7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2023-03-08vs GSTL40/Stokes/DunesLost 01
L#1 DoublesSally Canepari / Diana Morgan vs Dipti Paudel / Becky Walls5-7, 1-6
2023-02-08vs GSTL40/Core/SurfWon 10
W#2 DoublesDiana Morgan / Deanne Johnson Stephens vs Gina Mahoney / Shannon Fries6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Sandra Jerbert
published
3.28
Karen Swartling
published
3.06
Diana Morgan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.04
Hiliary Whitt
published
3.04
Drucilla Kownacki
published
2.97
Georgiana King
published
2.94
Faith Bowling
published
2.88
Sally Canepari
published
2.78
Donna Calder
published
Kelle Siegmund
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hiliary Whitt + Sally Canepari134 matchesnot enough data
Deanne Johnson Stephens + Karen Swartling303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Deanne Johnson Stephens
19W–11L career · no lines in 2023
71%29%<1%
3.42
Sandra Jerbert
7W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
3.42
Karen Swartling
20W–12L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Diana Morgan
53W–74L career · 6 lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
3.06
Hiliary Whitt
8W–21L career · no lines in 2023
<1%37%63%
3.04
Drucilla Kownacki
12W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%38%62%
3.04
Georgiana King
8W–24L career · no lines in 2023
<1%59%41%
2.97
Faith Bowling
15W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
2.94
Sally Canepari
8W–17L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%19%
2.88
Donna Calder
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
2.78
Kelle Siegmund
7W–19L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.