Teams

GEPTA-4.0-Adult/40+W(Hufft)(FB)

SouthernNewMexico · 2025 USA ADULT 40 & OVER LEAGUE

16 players · average NTRP 4.00 / GEPTA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2025 USA ADULT 40 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Cheryl Ledford
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.70
Cindy Blackman
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 4
3.69
Carol Shannon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.51
Amelia Pilcher
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
Estela Loy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Gerla Gallardo
usually #2 Doubles 53%, also #1 Doubles 39% · published
Helga Sauza
usually #1 Singles 46%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
Laura Lama
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Melissa Arriola
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Melissa Hufft
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 19% · published
Monica Morga
usually #1 Doubles 54%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Patricia Dalbin
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 37% · published
Rebecca Loweree
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Rossana Roacho
usually #3 Doubles 41%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Yolanda Miranda
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Yolanda Zuverza
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Singles 22% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Monica Morga + Rebecca Loweree101150% games+0.9% vs expected
Rossana Roacho + Patricia Dalbin37960% games−0.9% vs expected
Amelia Pilcher + Cindy Blackman3445% gamesnot enough data
Estela Loy + Yolanda Miranda4247% gamesnot enough data
Gerla Gallardo + Patricia Dalbin2446% gamesnot enough data
Carol Shannon + Amelia Pilcher1443% gamesnot enough data
Estela Loy + Monica Morga134 matchesnot enough data
Gerla Gallardo + Rossana Roacho134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cheryl Ledford
37W–52L career · 14 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Cindy Blackman
44W–47L career · 10 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.70
4
Carol Shannon
57W–61L career · 8 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.69
4
Amelia Pilcher
27W–38L career · 9 lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.51
Estela Loy
67W–27L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Gerla Gallardo
96W–62L career · 36 lines in 2025
not enough data
Helga Sauza
74W–41L career · 34 lines in 2025
not enough data
Laura Lama
20W–17L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data
Melissa Arriola
36W–29L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Melissa Hufft
98W–71L career · 21 lines in 2025
not enough data
Monica Morga
70W–72L career · 24 lines in 2025
not enough data
Patricia Dalbin
99W–72L career · 35 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rebecca Loweree
57W–51L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rossana Roacho
123W–115L career · 39 lines in 2025
not enough data
Yolanda Miranda
60W–53L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Yolanda Zuverza
53W–49L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.