Teams

Kline - Lawn and Tennis

2025 Sandhills Adult 18 & over · 2.5 Adult Women

6 players · average NTRP 2.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-05vs Evans - Legacy LakesLost 12
L#1 DoublesSusan Lindamood / Nicole Lindamood vs Catherine Mills / Anialis Melendez Figueroa4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesValerie Kline vs Anne Marie DePalmo6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLynn Richardson / Elizabeth Hopewell vs LuAnne Murphy / Megumi Wendelken1-6, 1-6
2025-04-28vs Evans - Legacy LakesLost 02
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Hopewell / Valerie Kline vs Catherine Mills / Anne Marie DePalmo2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesSusan Lindamood vs Megumi Wendelken0-6, 1-6
2025-04-28vs Evans - Legacy LakesLost 12
L#1 DoublesValerie Kline / Susan Lindamood vs Rocio Frias / Anialis Melendez Figueroa7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Hopewell vs Alexandra Ward0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesHayes Lemons / Lynn Richardson vs Christine Lewis / Catherine Mills6-1, 6-3
2025-04-14vs Evans - Legacy LakesLost 02
L#1 DoublesValerie Kline / Lynn Richardson vs Megumi Wendelken / Anne Marie DePalmo0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Lindamood / Elizabeth Hopewell vs Heather Evans / Alexandra Ward2-6, 2-6
2025-03-24vs Evans - Legacy LakesLost 12
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Hopewell / Hayes Lemons vs LuAnne Murphy / Megumi Wendelken2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesValerie Kline vs Rocio Frias6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Lindamood / Lynn Richardson vs Anne Marie DePalmo / Catherine Mills1-6, 2-6
2025-03-03vs Evans - Legacy LakesWon 21
W#1 DoublesSusan Lindamood / Nicole Lindamood vs Alexandra Ward / Anne Marie DePalmo7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesHayes Lemons vs Megumi Wendelken6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLynn Richardson / Elizabeth Hopewell vs Heather Evans / Rocio Frias1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Adult Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.41 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.84
Hayes Lemons
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.55
Susan Lindamood
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.31
Valerie Kline
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
1.95
Elizabeth Hopewell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Lynn Richardson
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Nicole Lindamood
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Hayes Lemons
18W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%89%10%
2.84
Susan Lindamood
17W–15L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%36%64%
2.55
Valerie Kline
4W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%92%8%
2.31
2.5
Elizabeth Hopewell
1W–8L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.95
Lynn Richardson
1W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nicole Lindamood
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.