Teams

KC ORANGE

2022 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 3.75 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-06-01vs SSH GREYWon 41
L#1 DoublesBrent Johnson / Tom Chase vs Dave Blanco / Jon Johnson3-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesREECE KELLY vs Michael Walker6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesChris Kelly / Scott Ethridge vs Philip Bryant / Vincent Brady6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesRYAN KELLY vs James Robertson6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTerry Egert / David Winslow vs Al Cunningham / Bob Gamble6-2, 6-2
2022-05-25vs HRCA BLUEWon 21
L#1 DoublesGary Anderson / David Winslow vs Mitchell Fisher / Bob Keith6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesREECE KELLY vs Jeff Ustun6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTerry Egert / Scott Ethridge vs Chris Heath / Shawn Audino7-6, 6-4
2022-05-18vs WC NAVYWon 32
L#1 DoublesGerard Conroy / Chris Kelly vs Roger Overbey / Gary Murphy6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesREECE KELLY vs John Mahalik6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDavid Winslow / Gary Anderson vs Dave Donnell / Evan Ela6-7, 6-7
W#2 SinglesRYAN KELLY vs Marty Bruno6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBrent Johnson / Tom Chase vs Martin Atlas / John Nichols6-3, 6-2
2022-05-17vs KC BLUELost 23
L#1 DoublesScott Ethridge / Brent Johnson vs Dustin Collins / Jimmie Rose6-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesREECE KELLY vs Martin Chedid7-6, 7-6
L#2 DoublesTerry Egert / David Winslow vs Clay Adams / Robert Brigham3-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesRYAN KELLY vs Perry Christie4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesGerard Conroy / Chris Kelly vs Steve Iannacito / David MacAdam4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-04-27vs HRCA NAVYLost 05
L#1 DoublesGary Anderson / Tom Chase vs Gregory Fraikor / Matthew Ryan1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesBrent Johnson vs Prakash Hariharan0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTerry Egert / David Winslow vs Hunter Hostelley / Brandon Kalusa2-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesScott Ethridge vs Edward Kolb3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesChris Kelly / RYAN KELLY vs Kirk Wise / Robert Cochran5-7, 4-6
2022-04-20vs SSLT NAVYLost 13
L#1 DoublesGerard Conroy / Brent Johnson vs Richard Best / John Waring3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesScott Ethridge vs Shawn Morgan2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesTom Chase / Gary Anderson vs David Burdick / Jeff Johnson6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesTerry Egert / David Winslow vs Robert Alexander / Bradley Schuster6-4, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings20 teams · MEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CACM GREY7032315224
2WP ORANGE7029619240
3BTA GREY7027819225
4GAC GREY7028720262
5HRCA NAVY5123717196
6GLDN BLUE52241128279
7SH BLUE52181740310
8BM ORANGE43211432280
9SSG RED43201536286
10KC GREY43201536311
11LTC GREEN43181737347
12CM MAROON43161944350
13BRMST MAROON34181741345
14CR BLUE34161945349
15BVP RED34171846351
16KC ORANGE24121840301
17LEBTC BLACK25142145329
18HRCA BLACK25142147356
19SKY SILVER25152047358
20RRTC NAVY1692654370

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Gary Anderson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.65
Gerard Conroy
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.61
Scott Ethridge
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
3.27
Brent Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.17
Terry Egert
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
David Winslow
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Murray McNeil
published
REECE KELLY
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
RYAN KELLY
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Terry Egert + David Winslow3743% games+3.8% vs expected
Terry Egert + Gary Anderson4550% games+0.7% vs expected
Scott Ethridge + Brent Johnson3641% games−8.2% vs expected
Brent Johnson + Gerard Conroy0630% games−13.8% vs expected
Terry Egert + Gerard Conroy1541% gamesnot enough data
Terry Egert + Brent Johnson0527% gamesnot enough data
Gerard Conroy + Gary Anderson134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Gary Anderson
32W–50L career · 4 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Gerard Conroy
23W–47L career · 3 lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
3.65
Scott Ethridge
38W–40L career · 5 lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.61
3.5
Brent Johnson
22W–63L career · 5 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Terry Egert
39W–68L career · 5 lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
David Winslow
10W–28L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Murray McNeil
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
REECE KELLY
14W–7L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
RYAN KELLY
6W–4L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.