Teams

B4 ACAC Hollomon

2023 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weeknight Men · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.83 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-06-08vs B7 Willow Oaks CC DuntonLost 02
L#1 SinglesMichael Hollomon vs James Dunton6-1, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 SinglesJeff Bosch vs Janus Sebastien Barredo2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-06-02vs B5 Avalon McCarty LitesWon 10
W#3 DoublesMichael Hollomon / Jason Ruth vs Todd Mungo / George Brickley6-2, 6-3
2023-05-18vs B10 CCV WherryLost 01
L#1 DoublesLoc Pfeiffer / Jeff Bosch vs Tom Cricchi / Michael Brown4-6, 4-6
2023-05-11vs B8 Burkwood McKelveyLost 01
L#2 SinglesMichael Hollomon vs Ethan Belote2-6, 0-5
2023-05-04vs B6 Westwood GilmanWon 20
W#1 DoublesLoc Pfeiffer / Jeff Bosch vs Carter Berry / Chris Gilman6-2, 6-3
W#2 SinglesMichael Hollomon vs Murray Blake7-5, 6-1
2023-04-27vs B1 Hermitage FisherWon 20
W#2 DoublesJeff Bosch / Loc Pfeiffer vs Stephen Faraci / Wood Gyory6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesMichael Hollomon vs Douglas Gray6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2023-04-13vs B9 Salisbury RiegelWon 20
W#1 DoublesJeff Bosch / William Crowe vs Scott Broaddus / Whitley Day3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMichael Hollomon vs Charles Means6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Jeff Bosch
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.67
Michael Hollomon
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.58
William Crowe
published
3.55
Jonathan Brew
published
3.43
Jeffrey Raihall
published
3.41
Karl Koenig
published
3.39
Paul Davis
published
3.27
Craig Carman
published 3.5
Loc Pfeiffer
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jeff Bosch
205W–177L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Michael Hollomon
97W–107L career · 6 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.67
William Crowe
4W–14L career · no lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.58
Jonathan Brew
6W–7L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.55
Jeffrey Raihall
10W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%28%
3.43
Karl Koenig
12W–19L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
3.41
Paul Davis
15W–16L career · no lines in 2023
79%21%<1%
3.39
3.5
Craig Carman
7W–11L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
Loc Pfeiffer
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.