Teams

Hunters Green Bucks - J. Cotey

2022 Hillsborough Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Adult 55 & Over - Men

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-04-18Won 10
W#3 DoublesGregory Morrissey / John Cotey vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-03-26Won 10
W#2 DoublesDane Houston / Gary Zirbel vs Jim Kennerly / Dennis Weil6-1, 7-5
2022-03-19vs Hills - Davis Island/SternsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesGary Zirbel / Dane Houston vs Steven Ehrenpreis / Albert Alhadeff2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesEddie Collins / Gregory Morrissey vs Dennis Weil / Stephen Mullis3-6, 3-6
2022-03-05vs Hills - Davis Island/SternsWon 10
W#2 DoublesGregory Morrissey / Gary Zirbel vs John Knierman / Randy Sterns7-5, 6-2
2022-02-26vs Hills - Davis Island/SternsLost 01
L#2 DoublesMichael Bitting / Dane Houston vs Albert Alhadeff / Steven Ehrenpreis1-6, 4-6
2022-02-19vs Hills - Davis Island/SternsWon 10
W#2 DoublesDane Houston / Gary Zirbel vs Donald Bell / Mark Wolfson6-2, 6-3
2022-01-08vs Hills - Davis Island/SternsLost 01
L#2 DoublesGregory Morrissey / Gary Zirbel vs Thor Moody / Randy Sterns6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Adult 55 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.09
Charlton Johnson
published 4.5
3.80
Jose Alomar
published
3.69
Michael Bitting
published
3.68
Eddie Collins
published 4
3.54
Dane Houston
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.52
Gregory Morrissey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.35
Doug Angelone
published 3.5
John Cotey
published
Michael Dasilva
published
Tom Layton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Cotey + Doug Angelone314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Charlton Johnson
0W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
4.09
Jose Alomar
15W–8L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
Michael Bitting
5W–2L career · no lines in 2022
8%92%1%
3.69
4
Eddie Collins
8W–13L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.68
4
Dane Houston
155W–187L career · 4 lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.54
4
Gregory Morrissey
131W–125L career · 4 lines in 2022
45%55%<1%
3.52
3.5
Doug Angelone
9W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
3.35
John Cotey
16W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Michael Dasilva
81W–66L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tom Layton
40W–17L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.