Teams

RMC Flowers

2022 Richmond Tri-Level 18 & Over Weeknight · Richmond Tri-Level 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.25 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-10-29vs Avalon OttoWon 10
W#1 DoublesSusan Powell / Susan Vonderlehr Nolan vs Kristin Tetterton / Teresa Lancaster6-2, 6-4
2022-10-10vs KRA GereckeWon 10
W#1 DoublesSusan Powell / Susan Vonderlehr Nolan vs Sarah Dickinson / Katherine Shiveley7-5, 6-3
2022-09-26vs ACAC KrebsLost 01
L#1 DoublesSusan Powell / Susan Vonderlehr Nolan vs Sarah Rowe / Andrea Morrow6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2022-09-12Won 10
W#1 DoublesSusan Powell / Susan Vonderlehr Nolan vs Sarah Capehart / Susan DeLuca6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Tri-Level 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Lindsey O'Kane
published
3.96
Susan Powell
published
3.55
Susan Vonderlehr Nolan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Brenda Tyson
published 3.5
3.21
Victoria Galiffa
published
3.17
Megan Lloyd
published
3.03
Mona Stahling
published
2.87
Eliza Causey
published 3
Lisa Taylor
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lindsey O'Kane
7W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%31%69%
4.06
Susan Powell
32W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%61%39%
3.96
Susan Vonderlehr Nolan
105W–83L career · 4 lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.55
3.5
Brenda Tyson
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Victoria Galiffa
10W–5L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
Megan Lloyd
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.17
Mona Stahling
3W–11L career · no lines in 2022
40%60%<1%
3.03
3
Eliza Causey
22W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%15%
2.87
Lisa Taylor
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.