Teams

Hills/Schneider/50&Over7.5M

2024 Hillsborough Combo 50 & Over · 7.5 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.92 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-11-03vs HG Gang Green - E. CollinsWon 20
W#1 DoublesBrian Stone / Gvozden Dokic vs Sean Friday / Ken Kranick6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSylvain Gauthier / Jacob Munch vs Eddie Collins / Doug Angelone6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2024-10-13vs HG Gang Green - E. CollinsWon 10
W#1 DoublesChris Donahue / Sylvain Gauthier vs Eddie Collins / Ken Kranick6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Erik Breitenbach
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.92
Brian Stone
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.91
Eugen Schwarz
published 4
3.80
Jose Alomar
published
3.78
William Arfsten
published
Brad Armagost
published 4
3.69
Sylvain Gauthier
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.64
Gvozden Dokic
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.44
Jacob Munch
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sylvain Gauthier + Jose Alomar5256% games+5.3% vs expected
Jose Alomar + William Arfsten7158% games+1.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Erik Breitenbach
257W–136L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
3.96
4
Brian Stone
26W–20L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%73%27%
3.92
4
Eugen Schwarz
7W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.91
Jose Alomar
15W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.80
William Arfsten
11W–3L career · no lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.78
4
Brad Armagost
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sylvain Gauthier
23W–18L career · 2 lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Gvozden Dokic
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2024
14%86%<1%
3.64
3.5
Jacob Munch
24W–6L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%67%33%
3.44

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.