Teams

Marple - All The Single Ladies

2024 Loudoun Singles · Loudoun Singles 3.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-10-17Won 10
W#3 SinglesLaleh Packard vs Elizabeth McDonald6-3, 4-5
2024-10-11vs WilsonSplit 11
L#2 SinglesHolly Glauser vs Kim Hovda6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 SinglesMaryam Aranee vs Christy Bixler6-0, 6-2
2024-10-10vs Creighton Farms 3.0 RowleyWon 10
W#3 SinglesAnne Belardo vs Tamara Hurney6-1, 6-0
2024-10-09vs Creighton Farms 3.0 RowleyLost 01
L#3 SinglesCarly Schrager vs Erin Burnett5-7, 1-6
2024-10-08vs WilsonLost 02
L#1 SinglesLoAnne Hanlon vs Peggah Wilson4-6, 4-3
L#3 SinglesCarthina Marple vs Kayla Broussard3-6, 0-6
2024-10-03vs Furgal - Orange Crush- Ida LeeWon 10
W#1 SinglesHolly Glauser vs Alexandra Robinson7-5, 6-0
2024-09-17vs Furgal - Orange Crush- Ida LeeLost 01
L#3 SinglesMaryam Aranee vs Carey Mottet2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-09-12vs Aldridge - StoneleighWon 10
W#2 SinglesLaleh Packard vs Melissa Haugh6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Loudoun Singles 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Jill Vaughan
published
3.23
LoAnne Hanlon
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
3.21
Holly Glauser
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.05
Maryam Aranee
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
3.02
Anne Belardo
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.78
Carly Schrager
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.68
Dawn Regan
published 3
2.65
Laleh Packard
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.40
Carthina Marple
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maryam Aranee + Anne Belardo7550% gamesnot enough data
Carthina Marple + LoAnne Hanlon213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jill Vaughan
22W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.40
3
LoAnne Hanlon
103W–69L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%5%95%
3.23
3.5
Holly Glauser
86W–91L career · 2 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
3
Maryam Aranee
103W–91L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%36%64%
3.05
3
Anne Belardo
133W–68L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%43%57%
3.02
3
Carly Schrager
67W–72L career · 1 line in 2024
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Dawn Regan
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Laleh Packard
88W–156L career · 4 lines in 2024
15%85%1%
2.65
2.5
Carthina Marple
50W–87L career · 1 line in 2024
0%76%24%
2.40

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.