Teams

Corey Reich Tennis Center CW7.5A-DT

2025 COMBO - Daytime · Women 7.5

17 players · average NTRP 3.78 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesCori Kau / Stephanie Brendel vs Maddie Thomas / Amber Golini1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCathy Papahadjopoulos / Jacque Jumper vs Corazon Bellamy / Laurie Radanovich4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesChristina Wiellette / Erinn Nahid vs Stacey Blackman / Allene Rognon2-6, 2-6
2025-10-24vs ST MARY CW7.5A-DTWon 21
W#1 DoublesClaire Faughnan / Erinn Nahid vs Cecile Chenevey / Kathy Maratukulam6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLori Bouch / Stephanie Brendel vs Connie Koplan / Sarah Yancey6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCourtney Azad / Madeline Buty vs Linda Hofmeister / Trish Piatt7-6, 6-4
L#1 DoublesLinh Becker / Natalie Duxbury vs Shari Gonzalez / Jennifer Caruso5-7, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLori Bouch / Erinn Nahid vs Linda Choi / Abby Sexton1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAnnette Ellgaard / Jacque Jumper vs Heather Brown / Lisa Italia2-6, 5-7
2025-10-10vs ST MARY CW7.5A-DTWon 21
W#1 DoublesCourtney Azad / Lori Bouch vs Connie Koplan / Sarah Yancey5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCori Kau / Erinn Nahid vs Sandra Fox / Mia Dennis6-4, 6-0
L#3 DoublesSally Fitzhugh / Ali Jackson vs Linda Hofmeister / Trish Piatt6-7, 1-6
2025-09-19vs ST MARY CW7.5A-DTLost 03
L#1 DoublesCori Kau / Linh Becker vs Christine Treveloni / Diana Corbin4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesNatalie Duxbury / Erinn Nahid vs Kristen Schaffel / Kathy Maratukulam4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesClaire Faughnan / Stephanie Brendel vs Susan Rossi / Cecile Chenevey4-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#1 DoublesSally Fitzhugh / Erinn Nahid vs Melanie Campbell / Megan Patterson3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCori Kau / Stephanie Brendel vs Laurie Radanovich / Farrell Pappas5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMadeline Buty / Jacque Jumper vs Stacey Blackman / Viviana Meyer2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Cori Kau
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.73
Sally Fitzhugh
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.72
Cathy Papahadjopoulos
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
Annette Ellgaard
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Claire Faughnan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.62
Linh Becker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.61
Lori Bouch
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.59
Natalie Duxbury
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.47
Erinn Nahid
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.45
Madeline Buty
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
Courtney Azad
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.35
Stephanie Brendel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.25
Christina Wiellette
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Ali Jackson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Jacque Jumper
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Jane Martz
published
Katherine Devine
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Annette Ellgaard + Linh Becker2354% games+0.6% vs expected
Cori Kau + Linh Becker224 matchesnot enough data
Jacque Jumper + Stephanie Brendel123 matchesnot enough data
Erinn Nahid + Cathy Papahadjopoulos123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cori Kau
8W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%95%2%
3.74
Sally Fitzhugh
10W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Cathy Papahadjopoulos
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Annette Ellgaard
13W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Claire Faughnan
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.68
Linh Becker
11W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.62
Lori Bouch
2W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.61
Natalie Duxbury
3W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.59
3.5
Erinn Nahid
15W–11L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.47
Madeline Buty
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
65%35%<1%
3.45
4
Courtney Azad
6W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
71%29%<1%
3.43
Stephanie Brendel
6W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Christina Wiellette
1W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Ali Jackson
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Jacque Jumper
4W–16L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
Jane Martz
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Katherine Devine
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.