Teams

McCarty/Memphis

2025 Adult 55 & Over-Memphis · 3.5 Women 55 & Over

10 players · average NTRP 3.67 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-04-19vs Rucker/MemphisWon 30
W#1 DoublesPatricia Hayes / Michele Smith vs Salina Xu / Mary Sutton1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichelle McCarty / Anne Higgins vs Melinda Boudreau / Sandra Horn6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesNancy Goodwin / Carolyn Santos vs Roz Wallace / Cheryl Murphy6-1, 6-0
2025-04-12vs Sneed/MemphisWon 21
W#1 DoublesAnne Higgins / Nancy Goodwin vs Lisa Guyton / Susan Doane6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesEva Farris / Kecia Coleman vs Debra Sneed / Beth Harty Evetts4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMelony Bratton / Michele Smith vs Martha Podesta / Shelley Spiro6-3, 6-3
2025-04-03vs Chung/MemphisWon 21
W#1 DoublesKecia Coleman / Patricia Hayes vs Sandra Richards / Veronica Anthony6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesNancy Goodwin / Angela Payne vs Mina Chung / Wendy Wider-Burroughs6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesBetty Clark / Eva Farris vs Maria Bunch / Jennifer Sigan4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2025-03-22vs Sodini/MemphisWon 20
W#1 DoublesNancy Goodwin / Angela Payne vs Barby Patterson / Anne Thielemier6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCarolyn Santos / Betty Clark vs Kay Horne / Dana Ferry6-1, 6-3
2025-03-15vs Conrad/ MemphisWon 20
W#1 DoublesAnne Higgins / Melony Bratton vs Kelly Kitabchi / Kelley Smith6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesNancy Goodwin / Kecia Coleman vs Maria Dannemiller / Monika Wierdl6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Anne Higgins
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.68
Nancy Goodwin
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
3.49
Hollie Federman
published
3.37
Carolyn Santos
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.24
Melony Bratton
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.21
Eva Farris
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.16
Betty Clark
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.16
Haley Carlson
published
3.11
Kecia Coleman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.94
Patricia Hayes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anne Higgins + Nancy Goodwin14268% games+17.3% vs expected
Nancy Goodwin + Kecia Coleman18364% games+10.6% vs expected
Anne Higgins + Melony Bratton6455% games+2.4% vs expected
Melony Bratton + Nancy Goodwin134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Anne Higgins
45W–20L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
Nancy Goodwin
78W–30L career · 7 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.68
Hollie Federman
8W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.49
3.5
Carolyn Santos
22W–12L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
Melony Bratton
43W–37L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Eva Farris
22W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Betty Clark
4W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
13%87%1%
3.16
Haley Carlson
15W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%13%87%
3.16
Kecia Coleman
51W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.11
Patricia Hayes
11W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
2.94

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.