Teams

TOHS.Mehra

2022 CTRL Fall Singles 18 & Over · Fall Singles 18 & Over 3.5 Men

4 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-11-21Won 10
W#3 SinglesMark Spining vs Raul Pena7-5, 6-2
2022-11-14vs TOC.WoodWon 10
W#2 SinglesMark Spining vs Tyler DeZubay6-4, 6-3
2022-10-31vs MVL.KumarWon 10
W#2 SinglesMark Spining vs Vimal Kumar6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2022-10-24Won 10
W#3 SinglesMark Spining vs Baaqir Yusuf6-0, 6-2
2022-10-03vs TOC.DosslinWon 10
W#3 SinglesMark Spining vs Nick Byrne6-3, 6-1
2022-09-19vs TOC.KaranamLost 01
L#3 SinglesMark Spining vs Eslam Soliman4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fall Singles 18 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
3.68
3.66
Mark Spining
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.60
Karan Mehra
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Balaji Radhakrishnan + Karan Mehra3546% games−8.8% vs expected
Vamsee Pasangulapati + Mark Spining4553% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Vamsee Pasangulapati
136W–76L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Balaji Radhakrishnan
17W–22L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.68
4
Mark Spining
161W–93L career · 6 lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.66
Karan Mehra
18W–35L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.60

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.