Teams

Baseline Bros

2024 Prince Georges Singles · Prince Georges Singles 4.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-11-13vs Hardcourt Specialist 4.0Lost 01
L#1 SinglesKeitaro Nishimura vs Peter Berkowitz1-6, 2-6
2024-11-10vs Hardcourt Specialist 4.0Lost 02
L#1 SinglesJeremy Siegfried vs Prannoy Namala6-7, 3-4
L#2 SinglesChristopher Lewitzke vs Peter Berkowitz3-6, 0-6
2024-10-27vs Hardcourt Specialist 4.0Lost 01
L#2 SinglesKeitaro Nishimura vs Tucker Howard2-6, 3-6
2024-10-24vs Hardcourt Specialist 4.0Won 10
W#2 SinglesKeitaro Nishimura vs Prannoy Namala6-4, 4-4
2024-10-20vs Hardcourt Specialist 4.0Lost 03
L#1 SinglesBrad Ziajor vs FAUSTINO SANCHEZ5-7, 4-5
L#2 SinglesChristopher Lewitzke vs Peter Berkowitz1-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesDONG YOON SHIN vs Victor Sanchez2-6, 4-6
2024-10-14vs Hardcourt Specialist 4.0Lost 01
L#2 SinglesKeitaro Nishimura vs Jalen Best4-6, 0-6
2024-09-22vs Hardcourt Specialist 4.0Won 10
W#1 SinglesChristopher Lewitzke vs Benjamin Weiser3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-09-19vs Hardcourt Specialist 4.0Split 11
L#1 SinglesBrad Ziajor vs FAUSTINO SANCHEZ2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 SinglesChristopher Lewitzke vs Prannoy Namala6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Prince Georges Singles 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.18
Brad Ziajor
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
Christopher Lee
published 4
Christopher Lewitzke
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 4
3.72
Ali Hamdani
published 4
3.60
Keitaro Nishimura
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.31
DONG YOON SHIN
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Jeremy Siegfried
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeremy Siegfried + Brad Ziajor033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Brad Ziajor
65W–56L career · 2 lines in 2024
8%91%1%
4.18
4
Christopher Lee
7W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Christopher Lewitzke
6W–4L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Ali Hamdani
57W–51L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%1%
3.72
4
Keitaro Nishimura
148W–63L career · 4 lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.60
3.5
DONG YOON SHIN
7W–21L career · 1 line in 2024
1%91%8%
3.31
Jeremy Siegfried
1W–6L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.