Teams

MCTC/Wilson/Fantastic 40

2022 COTA USTA Adult 40 & Over Weekday Women - Spring · 4.0 weekday women

16 players · average NTRP 4.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0 weekday women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Patricia Lovely
published
3.80
Jody Twombly
published
3.75
Elizabeth Dagley
published 4
Anne Knox Hodges
published 4
Brenda Bray
published 4
3.71
Sarah Leppert
published
3.67
Shannon Dykes
published
3.64
Ellen Lemming
published 4
3.56
Laura Essex
published
3.52
Kelly Parker
published
Kristie Gasque
published
Lois Marques
published
Martha Wilson
published
Pamela Shurett
published
Stefanie Kemp
published
Tracy Tvrdy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly Parker + Laura Essex123 matchesnot enough data
Shannon Dykes + Laura Essex303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Patricia Lovely
8W–2L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.83
Jody Twombly
18W–4L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Elizabeth Dagley
4W–10L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Anne Knox Hodges
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Brenda Bray
5W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sarah Leppert
6W–4L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.71
Shannon Dykes
5W–0L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Ellen Lemming
2W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.64
Laura Essex
5W–3L career · no lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
3.56
Kelly Parker
7W–12L career · no lines in 2022
45%55%<1%
3.52
Kristie Gasque
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lois Marques
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Martha Wilson
4W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Pamela Shurett
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Stefanie Kemp
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tracy Tvrdy
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.