Teams

Byrd-CC

2025 CORTA Southern Combo 40 & Over - Summer · Women 5.5 (no advancement)

9 players · average NTRP 2.62 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-09-18vs Thomas-CCWon 30
W#1 DoublesJackie Tyo / Andrea Walden vs Amy Diehl / Pamela Thomas6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAngela Byrd / Gloria Shayne vs Jean Fuller / Alison Brown6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJoylene Coker / Brenda Kosobucki vs Letitia Houston / Jeanette Braski6-1, 6-1
2025-09-04vs Thomas-CCWon 30
W#1 DoublesBrenda Kosobucki / Lisa Presley vs Amy Diehl / Kristi Scott6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKimberly Udy / Joylene Coker vs Audra Beaudoin / Carolyn Lynn6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJennifer Graham / Amelia Hatfield vs Amy Hayes / Alison Brown6-2, 7-5
2025-08-17vs Thomas-CCWon 21
W#1 DoublesKimberly Udy / Jennifer Williams vs Leigh Yaughn / Kristi Scott6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAmelia Hatfield / Lisa Presley vs Alison Brown / Pamela Thomas6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesJennifer Graham / Mary Daniel vs Audra Beaudoin / Letitia Houston6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 5.5 (no advancement) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.40 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.63
Andrea Walden
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.59
Mary Daniel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.48
Joylene Coker
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.48
Angela Byrd
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.44
Gloria Shayne
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.34
Amelia Hatfield
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.27
Jackie Tyo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.22
Brenda Kosobucki
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.11
Kimberly Udy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Andrea Walden
27W–32L career · 3 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
2.63
Mary Daniel
8W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
26%74%<1%
2.59
Joylene Coker
26W–63L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%55%45%
2.48
2.5
Angela Byrd
48W–80L career · 1 line in 2025
0%56%44%
2.48
Gloria Shayne
30W–49L career · 1 line in 2025
0%66%34%
2.44
2.5
Amelia Hatfield
13W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%87%13%
2.34
Jackie Tyo
11W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
0%95%5%
2.27
2.5
Brenda Kosobucki
17W–28L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.22
Kimberly Udy
12W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.11

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.