Teams

Silvestry

2021 Tri-Level Metro · 4.5 Men

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / METROPOLITAN REGION

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2020-11-15vs Lee/BhagwagarLost 12
L#1 DoublesAlan Liu / Benjamin Aghion vs Bryan Pedersen / Peter Laurelli4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBrian Silvestry / Dennis Loleng vs Jatin Rajput / Nishad Deshpande4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJules Antigua / Theodore Ross vs Brian Shulstein / Vineet Ahuja2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2020-11-06vs MoramarcoLost 12
W#1 DoublesAlan Liu / Benjamin Aghion vs Shin Kang / Nicholas Tursi6-4, 0-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBrian Silvestry / Faycal Lhamidi vs Darryl Blue / Christopher DiMino5-7, 0-6
L#3 DoublesEduardo Mere / Jules Antigua vs Adam Moramarco / Chad Tongue6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2020-10-29vs Low/DoaneLost 12
L#1 DoublesAlex Zilberman / Lawrence Lehman vs Mitchell Low / Yassine Azagar5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesBrendan Moser / Joseph Bullaro vs Eddie Demirci / Matt Bartell6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMatthew Maycock / Theodore Ross vs Craig Hirschfeld / Peter Hsieh1-6, 4-6
2020-10-23vs Lee/BhagwagarSplit 11
L#2 DoublesBrendan Moser / Joseph Bullaro vs Louis Jacobs / Rajat Bhatia6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesEduardo Mere / Jules Antigua vs Attarid Samuel / Koray Yilmaz3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2020-10-18vs MoramarcoLost 02
L#1 DoublesAlex Zilberman / Lawrence Lehman vs Casey Schnabel / Nicholas Tursi5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesFaycal Lhamidi / Dennis Loleng vs Christopher DiMino / Vladimir Salomon2-6, 4-6
2020-10-11vs Low/DoaneLost 03
L#1 DoublesROHIT KUMAR / Alex Zilberman vs Mitchell Low / Yassine Azagar1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBrian Silvestry / Isaac Halpern vs Matt Bartell / Warren Chan3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesWalter Baker / Theodore Ross vs Craig Hirschfeld / Peter Hsieh0-6, 1-6
2020-10-05vs Lee/BhagwagarLost 12
W#1 DoublesAlex Zilberman / ROHIT KUMAR vs Peter Laurelli / Ken Yamamoto6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesBrian Silvestry / Faycal Lhamidi vs Nishad Deshpande / Rajat Bhatia6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTheodore Ross / Eduardo Mere vs Raymond Borno / Brian Shulstein2-6, 2-6
2020-09-30vs MoramarcoSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAlex Zilberman / ROHIT KUMAR vs Jacob Mastbaum / Adam Star7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesIsaac Halpern / Dennis Loleng vs Vladimir Salomon / Christopher DiMino3-6, 1-6
2020-09-23vs Low/DoaneLost 02
L#1 DoublesAlex Zilberman / ROHIT KUMAR vs Mitchell Low / Yassine Azagar6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBrian Silvestry / Isaac Halpern vs Frank Fattizzi / Eddie Demirci1-6, 4-6
2019-10-29vs Lee/BhagwagarSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAlex Zilberman / Lawrence Lehman vs Benjamin Thomas / Zachary Ott6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBrian Silvestry / Tim Metzger vs Christopher Daniels / Horatio Wildman3-6, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Low/Doane0920720214
2Silvestry0962145293

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Brendan Moser
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.22
Alex Zilberman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Brian Silvestry
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Dennis Loleng
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Theodore Ross
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
3.71
Lawrence Lehman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.44
Eduardo Mere
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
Isaac Halpern
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.29
Matthew Maycock
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Benjamin Aghion
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Faycal Lhamidi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Joseph Bullaro
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jules Antigua
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Matthew Maycock + Isaac Halpern7168% games+17.9% vs expected
Brendan Moser + Joseph Bullaro10655% games+1.3% vs expected
Isaac Halpern + Brian Silvestry2348% games−0.5% vs expected
Alex Zilberman + Lawrence Lehman2342% gamesnot enough data
Faycal Lhamidi + Brian Silvestry123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Brendan Moser
25W–22L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
4.5
Alex Zilberman
78W–53L career · 6 lines in 2021
5%94%2%
4.22
4
Brian Silvestry
50W–56L career · 9 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Dennis Loleng
23W–41L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Theodore Ross
92W–92L career · 7 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.73
Lawrence Lehman
45W–78L career · 3 lines in 2021
99%1%<1%
3.71
3.5
Eduardo Mere
73W–34L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Isaac Halpern
60W–93L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%88%11%
3.34
Matthew Maycock
43W–28L career · 1 line in 2021
1%93%6%
3.29
Benjamin Aghion
2W–10L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Faycal Lhamidi
5W–8L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Joseph Bullaro
77W–58L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Jules Antigua
28W–5L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.