Teams

HG NAVY

2023 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 2.62 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-05-31vs KNO GREENLost 01
L#1 DoublesStefania Scott / Kristen Rosado vs Molly Ehlinger / Karla Goodhart2-6, 3-6
2023-05-24vs CCV YELLOWLost 01
L#2 DoublesStefania Scott / Jodi Roberts vs Heather Dolan Jackson / Shauna Sanidas5-7, 3-6
2023-05-17vs EM REDLost 01
L#1 DoublesKay Langman / Kristen Rosado vs Amy Pell / Kesa Sullivan0-6, 0-6
2023-05-10vs GAC GOLDLost 01
L#1 DoublesStefania Scott / Heidi Custer vs Allison Keefer / Adeline Singer4-6, 3-6
2023-05-03vs SS-H YELLOWLost 01
L#1 DoublesStefania Scott / Kay Langman vs Lisa Nelson / Carie Lopez2-6, 3-6
2023-04-26vs WC TEALLost 01
L#1 DoublesKay Langman / Jeni Anderson vs Kate Kiker / Katie Davis2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.40 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.86
Heidi Custer
published 3
2.66
Jeni Anderson
published
2.56
Erica Bowling
published
2.32
Stefania Scott
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.29
Jodi Roberts
published
2.26
Katrina Hebert
published
2.19
Kay Langman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.05
Beth Seuell
published 2.5
Kristen Rosado
published
Sara Katt
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sara Katt + Katrina Hebert213 matchesnot enough data
Beth Seuell + Katrina Hebert213 matchesnot enough data
Stefania Scott + Heidi Custer213 matchesnot enough data
Jeni Anderson + Kay Langman213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Heidi Custer
67W–60L career · type A · no lines in 2023
1%84%15%
2.86
Jeni Anderson
11W–20L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%1%
2.66
Erica Bowling
3W–14L career · no lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
2.56
2.5
Stefania Scott
50W–64L career · 4 lines in 2023
0%90%10%
2.32
Jodi Roberts
5W–10L career · no lines in 2023
0%93%7%
2.29
Katrina Hebert
7W–12L career · no lines in 2023
0%95%5%
2.26
2.5
Kay Langman
22W–53L career · 3 lines in 2023
0%99%1%
2.19
2.5
Beth Seuell
2W–16L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.05
Kristen Rosado
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sara Katt
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.