Teams

MC ORANGE

2023 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT

7 players · average NTRP 3.88 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-09-05vs NJ GREENLost 02
L#1 DoublesSpencer Winstanley / Jules Perryman vs Henry Carson / Greg Leaver2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesBrett Gedvilas vs Rafael Rosario3-6, 0-6
2023-08-29vs LEBTC ORANGEWon 20
W#1 DoublesBrett Gedvilas / Adam Kemp vs Jon Greenfield / Todd Campbell1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRohit Bhattacharya / Jules Perryman vs Ron Valencia / Chris Heath6-2, 6-4
2023-08-22vs KC-CC BLACKLost 01
L#2 DoublesBrett Gedvilas / Adam Kemp vs Raymond Kinch / Rob Deevy6-7, 6-7
2023-08-15vs LTC-M ORANGESplit 11
W#1 DoublesBrett Gedvilas / Albert Downs vs Max Coates / Leighton Johnson6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesJules Perryman vs Andrew Adams1-6, 3-6
2023-08-08vs KC-RH BLUESplit 11
L#1 DoublesAlbert Downs / Brett Gedvilas vs Mitchell Harper / Robert Lobascio5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJules Perryman / Spencer Winstanley vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-08-01vs NJ GREENLost 01
L#2 DoublesRohit Bhattacharya / Jules Perryman vs Dave Kranzler / Craig Christensen6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2023-07-25vs LEBTC ORANGELost 02
L#1 DoublesAlbert Downs / Brett Gedvilas vs Amos Smith / Mitchell Fisher5-7, 6-0, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJules Perryman / Steven Yi vs Ron Valencia / Jon Greenfield3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Albert Downs
published 4
3.72
Brett Gedvilas
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.56
Adam Kemp
published 4
3.25
Jules Perryman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 3.5
Rohit Bhattacharya
published
Spencer Winstanley
published
Steven Yi
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Adam Kemp + Brett Gedvilas3350% games+8.6% vs expected
Brett Gedvilas + Jules Perryman2342% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Albert Downs
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Brett Gedvilas
27W–42L career · 6 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Adam Kemp
4W–10L career · no lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.56
3.5
Jules Perryman
12W–32L career · 6 lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.25
Rohit Bhattacharya
5W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Spencer Winstanley
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Steven Yi
2W–14L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.