Teams

Bew - RS Clay

2021 Escambia Trilevel 18 & Over · 3.5

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-11-11vs Florida/Gonzalez/TrilevelLost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Bew / Jami Steinmetz vs Lori Gonzalez / Claudia Simmons2-6, 4-6
2021-10-18vs Florida/Gonzalez/TrilevelLost 01
L#2 DoublesRenee Bradford / Angela Stewart vs Charlotte Stark / Arlene Doyle2-6, 4-6
2021-10-06vs Fletcher - RS ClaySplit 11
W#1 DoublesLisa Bew / Lauren Haack vs Michelle Covell / Rachel Trahan6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMecy Wimberly / Kelly Dempsey vs Amber Fletcher / Omitope Taylor3-6, 1-6
2021-10-03vs Florida/Gonzalez/TrilevelLost 01
L#2 DoublesBonita Witkin / Renee Bradford vs Shellie McCall / Arlene Doyle1-6, 5-7
2021-09-28vs Chapman - SHLSplit 11
W#2 DoublesRenee Bradford / Angela Stewart vs Wanda Chapman / Amy Harrison5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMecy Wimberly / Jennifer Gilroy vs Tami Lockard / Jeshua Reddecliff3-6, 3-6
2021-09-07Won 10
W#1 DoublesLisa Bew / Jami Steinmetz vs Kelly Barnhill / Shelby Greene6-3, 6-3
2021-08-31vs Fletcher - RS ClayWon 21
W#1 DoublesLisa Bew / Lauren Haack vs Sarah Francis / Susan Nitterauer6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRenee Bradford / Bonita Witkin vs Amber Fletcher / Hannah Mckissick3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMecy Wimberly / Jennifer Gilroy vs Dawn Marino / Lauren Anderson6-3, 0-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.30
Jami Steinmetz
published 4.5
4.17
Lauren Haack
published
3.90
Lisa Bew
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.78
Renee Bradford
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
Bonita Witkin
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.61
Angela Stewart
published 4
3.60
Kelly Dempsey
published
3.26
Jacqueline Wallace
published 3.5
3.24
Mecy Wimberly
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Renee Bradford + Lisa Bew1543% gamesnot enough data
Bonita Witkin + Mecy Wimberly2352% gamesnot enough data
Bonita Witkin + Lisa Bew3256% gamesnot enough data
Bonita Witkin + Renee Bradford134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Jami Steinmetz
3W–1L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
4.30
Lauren Haack
6W–6L career · no lines in 2021
10%90%1%
4.17
4
Lisa Bew
77W–84L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%78%21%
3.90
Renee Bradford
134W–163L career · 4 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Bonita Witkin
55W–66L career · 7 lines in 2021
18%82%<1%
3.62
4
Angela Stewart
3W–4L career · no lines in 2021
20%80%<1%
3.61
Kelly Dempsey
4W–12L career · no lines in 2021
21%79%<1%
3.60
3.5
Jacqueline Wallace
7W–6L career · no lines in 2021
2%95%3%
3.26
Mecy Wimberly
96W–91L career · 3 lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.24

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.