Teams

NKoesel/SChandler (Raintree)

2024 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over 6.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.14 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-10-02vs ABroemel (Queens)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesTricia Shaw / Niki Koesel vs Abbey Ellis / Lauren Smith2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCarolyn Ludwin / Elizabeth Scoville vs Allison Broemel / Daniella James3-6, 2-6
2024-09-18vs KCronin/LFerguson (Piper Glen)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesCaroline Cox / Angela MacMurphy vs Marion Mande / Joanne Joliet1-6, 3-6
2024-09-11vs OBanchik/NO'Brien (Life Time)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesSusan Chandler / Niki Koesel vs Madelaine LeBlanc / Colleen Beierwaltes1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesVicky Shannon / Carolyn Ludwin vs Olya Banchik / Karen Schneider1-6, 2-6
2024-09-04vs LHuntington (Queens)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesSarah Prochaska / Angela MacMurphy vs Laura Case / Claudia Prager3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMindy Zimmerman / Margot Bizon vs Julie Moore / Catherine Crigler0-6, 5-7
2024-08-28vs JCarney (PPRSC)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesVicky Shannon / Elizabeth Harvey vs Alexis Self / Jill Zakerski6-7, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCarolyn Ludwin / Kimberlee Curley vs Karen Fisher / Jen Meyer1-6, 1-6
2024-08-21Won 10
W#3 DoublesSarah Prochaska / Carolyn Ludwin vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-08-14vs AMinish (Lifetime)Split 11
L#1 DoublesNiki Koesel / Mindy Zimmerman vs Lori DiFazio / Jennifer Siddall4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesMargot Bizon / Angela MacMurphy vs Scarlett Cochran / Katie Kuehner6-3, 7-5
2024-08-07vs SRock/HLee (Piper Glen)Won 10
W#2 DoublesNiki Koesel / Suzanne Austin vs Shelley Crocker / TAMMIE BRANDT6-1, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Suzanne Austin
published
3.21
Caroline Cox
published 3.5
3.20
Mindy Zimmerman
published
3.12
Katie Eggers
published
3.09
Angela MacMurphy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.03
Susan Chandler
published
2.96
Tricia Shaw
published
2.95
Niki Koesel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.83
Kimberlee Curley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Vicky Shannon
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.75
Margot Bizon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.67
Carolyn Ludwin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Elizabeth Scoville
published
Sarah Prochaska
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tricia Shaw + Katie Eggers5160% games+19.9% vs expected
Niki Koesel + Katie Eggers7357% games+10.9% vs expected
Mindy Zimmerman + Suzanne Austin3446% games+5.3% vs expected
Tricia Shaw + Margot Bizon2343% games−6.4% vs expected
Margot Bizon + Angela MacMurphy17656% gamesnot enough data
Niki Koesel + Tricia Shaw5157% gamesnot enough data
Susan Chandler + Tricia Shaw1430% gamesnot enough data
Mindy Zimmerman + Angela MacMurphy3256% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Suzanne Austin
31W–42L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Caroline Cox
13W–27L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.21
Mindy Zimmerman
20W–31L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.20
Katie Eggers
26W–20L career · no lines in 2024
<1%18%82%
3.12
3.5
Angela MacMurphy
84W–67L career · 3 lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
3.09
Susan Chandler
35W–30L career · no lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
3.03
Tricia Shaw
30W–31L career · no lines in 2024
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
Niki Koesel
112W–67L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%66%34%
2.95
3
Kimberlee Curley
46W–67L career · 1 line in 2024
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Vicky Shannon
87W–57L career · 5 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Margot Bizon
52W–44L career · 2 lines in 2024
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Carolyn Ludwin
27W–43L career · 4 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
2.67
Elizabeth Scoville
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sarah Prochaska
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.