Teams

Arbor Greene - C. VanMeter

2022 Hillsborough Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over Day- Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.20 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#1 DoublesDenys Hubbard / Jiyoung Yoon vs MARY HESTON / Audrey Kessler6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRebecca Gaier / AMY ISAAC vs Olga Bonelli / Kelly Dobsha6-0, 6-3
2022-02-28vs Van Dyke Farms - P. MooreWon 30
W#1 DoublesRebecca Gaier / Celeste Kallenborn vs Linda Frank / Pamela Moore6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesDenys Hubbard vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAMY ISAAC / Kelley Coffey vs Barbara Ball / Jan Nelson7-5, 6-1
2022-02-15vs Yachty By Nature - A. RockwoodSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRebecca Gaier / Sandra Bell vs Amy Hale / Monica Barkett5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAMY ISAAC / Kelley Coffey vs Lauren Green / Nichole Vogt6-3, 6-0
2022-02-07vs HCC Overserved - Borel-SaladinSplit 11
W#1 SinglesRebecca Gaier vs Amy Schnackenberg6-3, 7-6
L#2 SinglesAMY ISAAC vs Maria Yulee Guim2-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesRebecca Gaier / Denys Hubbard vs Jihea Helme / Pamela Gonzalez6-1, 6-1
W#1 DoublesKelley Coffey / Denys Hubbard vs Karen Cleland / Nikki Spirakis6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesRebecca Gaier / Crystal Vanmeter vs Carol Guidera / Carrie Bradley6-2, 7-6
W#2 SinglesAMY ISAAC vs Sherry Peterson6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAMY ISAAC / Rebecca Gaier vs Johnessa Hern / Emelia Flitman4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesCeleste Kallenborn / Denys Hubbard vs Kelly Machonis / DIANA POSADA6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 18 & Over Day- Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
AMY ISAAC
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.06
Rebecca Gaier
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
2.97
Jiyoung Yoon
published
2.90
Crystal Vanmeter
published 3
2.82
Kelley Coffey
published
2.75
Denys Hubbard
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.75
Sandra Bell
published
2.63
Amy Butts
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Denys Hubbard + Rebecca Gaier11554% games−0.3% vs expected
Rebecca Gaier + AMY ISAAC121055% gamesnot enough data
Denys Hubbard + AMY ISAAC5060% gamesnot enough data
Kelley Coffey + Jiyoung Yoon224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
AMY ISAAC
107W–59L career · 6 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Rebecca Gaier
148W–84L career · 7 lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
3.06
Jiyoung Yoon
11W–25L career · no lines in 2022
<1%60%40%
2.97
3
Crystal Vanmeter
8W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
2.90
Kelley Coffey
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
2.82
3
Denys Hubbard
126W–90L career · 5 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
Sandra Bell
2W–8L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Amy Butts
5W–3L career · no lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
2.63

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.