Teams

The Slice Girls

2026 One Doubles-Summer · 3.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-08-01vs Alley CatsWon 10
W#1 DoublesLaura King / Lucy Davis vs Erin Fischer / Sonja Larson - Williams7-5, 7-6
2026-07-13vs Slice GirlsWon 10
W#1 DoublesMaggie Gallagher / Alison Ambauen vs Katie Pitt / Kristin Coovert6-4, 6-4
2026-07-02vs Court QueensWon 10
W#1 DoublesLaura King / Caitlyn McDonald vs Julie Quesada / Karina Spellman6-1, 6-2
2026-06-30vs Brad’s Caffeinated SquirrelsLost 01
L#1 DoublesMaggie Gallagher / Alison Ambauen vs Caroline Thompson / Jillian Strayer3-6, 3-6
2026-06-23vs SWW-BelousWon 10
W#1 DoublesMaggie Gallagher / Lauren Treleven vs Elena Belous / Laila Bush6-2, 7-6
2026-06-08vs No FaultsWon 10
W#1 DoublesMaggie Gallagher / Alison Ambauen vs Julie Templin / Marit Berg6-2, 6-6
2026-06-03vs Artman SummerWon 10
W#1 DoublesMaggie Gallagher / Lauren Treleven vs Leslie Artman / Elizabeth McDougall5-7, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.90
Laura King
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.89
Lauren Treleven
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.82
Alison Ambauen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Caitlyn McDonald
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Maggie Gallagher
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.66
Lucy Davis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alison Ambauen + Laura King3353% games+6.3% vs expected
Lucy Davis + Laura King8360% games+4.4% vs expected
Lauren Treleven + Laura King3252% games−2.1% vs expected
Maggie Gallagher + Alison Ambauen224 matchesnot enough data
Lauren Treleven + Alison Ambauen224 matchesnot enough data
Maggie Gallagher + Laura King033 matchesnot enough data
Lucy Davis + Alison Ambauen213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Laura King
28W–26L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.90
3
Lauren Treleven
22W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.89
3
Alison Ambauen
32W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Caitlyn McDonald
1W–0L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3
Maggie Gallagher
26W–22L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Lucy Davis
25W–24L career · 1 line in 2026
11%89%<1%
2.66

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.