Teams

1 ACAC Hollomon

2024 Richmond Singles · Richmond Singles 4.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.90 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-11-07vs 9 Woodlake UrbanWon 30
W#1 SinglesMichael Hollomon vs Edward Moss6-2, 6-0
W#2 SinglesCliff Heller vs Matt Stoss7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 SinglesRyan Bardaro vs Michael Cabral3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-10-31vs 4 Powhatan 4.0 Tennisbums - KelleyLost 02
L#1 SinglesCliff Heller vs Nathan Maultsby3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 SinglesRyan Bardaro vs Johan Lood2-6, 1-6
2024-10-24vs 8 Willow Oaks DuntonWon 10
W#2 SinglesJeff Bosch vs Philip Strunk6-0, 6-4
2024-10-17vs 13 Bon Air MorrisWon 30
W#1 SinglesMajd Babik vs Dylan Brod6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMichael Hollomon vs Keith Garrison6-3, 6-1
W#3 SinglesJeff Bosch vs Heath Flohre6-2, 6-3
2024-10-10vs 7 Westwood - RabhanWon 21
W#1 SinglesMajd Babik vs Kirk Evans6-4, 7-5
L#2 SinglesMichael Hollomon vs Shailesh Khatri6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 SinglesCliff Heller vs Carter Slough6-1, 6-1
2024-10-01vs 10 The Westwood BoysLost 02
L#2 SinglesJeff Bosch vs Brewster Brown1-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesRyan Bardaro vs John Martin2-6, 5-7
2024-09-26vs 5 Burkwood - SinsabaughLost 02
L#1 SinglesMichael Hollomon vs Turner Cole1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesCliff Heller vs Joshua Durbin1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Singles 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Majd Babik
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.80
Jeff Bosch
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 4
3.68
Michael Hollomon
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4
3.64
Mo Makkiya
published
3.63
Cliff Heller
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 4
3.53
Doug Okay
published
3.36
Ryan Bardaro
usually #3 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeff Bosch + Ryan Bardaro4549% gamesnot enough data
Majd Babik + Jeff Bosch4353% gamesnot enough data
Cliff Heller + Jeff Bosch224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Majd Babik
202W–105L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%81%18%
3.87
4
Jeff Bosch
205W–176L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.80
4
Michael Hollomon
97W–107L career · 4 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
Mo Makkiya
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%1%
3.64
4
Cliff Heller
147W–125L career · 4 lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.63
Doug Okay
5W–12L career · no lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
3.53
3.5
Ryan Bardaro
176W–149L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%84%16%
3.36

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.