Teams

Racqueteers 6.0W

2024 Prince Georges Adult 18-39 · Prince Georges 6.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.07 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-08-03vs LoVV 6.0WWon 21
L#1 Female DoublesMarissa Schmauch Womble / Calle Cone vs Colleen Quinlan / Dhivya Rani Shankaran3-6, 2-6
W#2 Female DoublesAndrea Torres / Ayanna Charles vs Esme Rogers / Jinyoung Sohn3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 Female DoublesDanielle Tiley / Suzie Kowalewski vs Kimberly Smith / Jennifer Brooks7-5, 6-3
2024-07-25vs LoVV 6.0WLost 12
L#1 Female DoublesMarissa Schmauch Womble / Ayanna Charles vs Colleen Quinlan / Dhivya Rani Shankaran3-6, 2-6
W#2 Female DoublesLauren Chilton / Danielle Tiley vs Emily Harris / Kimberly Smith6-2, 6-1
L#3 Female DoublesCalle Cone / Tetiana Vagizova vs Jinyoung Sohn / Esme Rogers4-6, 1-6
2024-07-07vs LoVV 6.0WSplit 11
L#1 Female DoublesTetiana Vagizova / Ayanna Charles vs Brittany Jennings / Dhivya Rani Shankaran3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 Female DoublesCourtney Johnson / Calle Cone vs Kimberly Smith / Jennifer Brooks7-5, 4-4
2024-06-30Lost 01
L#3 Female DoublesDanielle Tiley / Jasmine Miles vs Jennifer Brooks / Kimberly Smith6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2024-06-23vs LoVV 6.0WSplit 11
L#1 Female DoublesKara Stegeman / Jasmine Miles vs Dhivya Rani Shankaran / Jinyoung Sohn5-7, 3-6
W#3 Female DoublesDiem Salmon / Danielle Tiley vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Prince Georges 6.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Lauren Chilton
published
3.32
Diem Salmon
usually #3 Female Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Kara Stegeman
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 3
2.91
Ayanna Charles
usually #1 Female Doubles 67%, also #2 Female Doubles 33% · published 3
2.68
Andrea Torres
published 3
2.68
Jasmine Miles
usually #1 Female Doubles 50%, also #3 Female Doubles 50% · published 3
2.62
Danielle Tiley
usually #3 Female Doubles 75%, also #2 Female Doubles 25% · published 3
2.55
Calle Cone
usually #3 Female Doubles 67%, also #1 Female Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Calle Cone + Danielle Tiley213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren Chilton
18W–12L career · no lines in 2024
53%47%<1%
3.49
3.5
Diem Salmon
63W–49L career · 1 line in 2024
1%91%8%
3.32
3
Kara Stegeman
81W–37L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%5%95%
3.21
3
Ayanna Charles
32W–31L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%75%24%
2.91
3
Andrea Torres
6W–13L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
2.68
3
Jasmine Miles
43W–57L career · 2 lines in 2024
8%91%1%
2.68
3
Danielle Tiley
33W–33L career · type A · 4 lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
2.62
3
Calle Cone
42W–50L career · 3 lines in 2024
35%65%<1%
2.55
Marissa Schmauch Womble
5W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.