Teams

Fee - Rouveyrol

2026 Brevard Combo 18 & Over · 6.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.30 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-24vs EFSC - UrbanWon 30
W#1 DoublesLaura Rouveyrol / Mary Failla vs Allison Moorhead / Cynthia Simmons6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesBrooke Maratta / Judy Beckler vs Melissa Lamp / Cyndi Mcdougall6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMichelle Dunn / Janine Brunkala vs Faith Urban / Miriam Melendez6-0, 6-0
2026-08-17vs Kiwi - WyandLost 12
W#1 DoublesLaura Rouveyrol / Kimberly Kressler vs Tina Murphy / Katie Recker2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichelle Dunn / Elizabeth Meredith vs Allison Wyand / Julianne Moore0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSandra Edwards / Beth Kalish vs Allison Braet / Angila Burke1-6, 5-7
2026-08-10vs Fee - NormanLost 12
W#1 DoublesKimberly Kressler / Milena Alicea vs Bev Wilcocks / Cheryl Toth6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesBeth Kalish / Sandra Edwards vs Colleen Mulryne / Erin O'Brien3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLaura Rouveyrol / Kim Tice vs Dorota Dembinska / Kelly Norman6-1, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Judy Beckler
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Elizabeth Meredith
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Kimberly Kressler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Mary Failla
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Janine Brunkala
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Sandra Edwards
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.00
Kim Tice
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Beth Kalish
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.87
Brooke Maratta
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.81
Milena Alicea
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.80
Karen Lee
published
2.78
Laura Rouveyrol
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.69
Michelle Dunn
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.53
Jenifer Raymond
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Judy Beckler
106W–82L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Elizabeth Meredith
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Kimberly Kressler
70W–76L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%91%1%
3.18
Mary Failla
10W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
9%90%1%
3.17
Janine Brunkala
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
24%75%<1%
3.09
Sandra Edwards
5W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.09
Kim Tice
5W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.00
3
Beth Kalish
18W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
2.94
3
Brooke Maratta
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%83%17%
2.87
Milena Alicea
12W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
1%92%7%
2.81
Karen Lee
6W–6L career · no lines in 2026
1%92%7%
2.80
Laura Rouveyrol
16W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%5%
2.78
Michelle Dunn
11W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%92%1%
2.69
Jenifer Raymond
16W–8L career · no lines in 2026
0%40%60%
2.53

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.