Teams

BC-LLW- PVTC/IanForsyth

2025 Adult 65 & Over - Beach Cities · BC Men - 7.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.25 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-09-27vs BC-AltaVista/CherylUnreinWon 20
W#1 DoublesSteve Hirano / Rex Claridge vs Jon Heyman / Robert Ng5-5
W#2 DoublesDavid Stone / Jonathan Lane vs Edward Hyman / Ronald Chang6-0, 5-0
2025-09-20vs BC-AltaVista/CherylUnreinSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDavid Stone / Nam Lai vs James Do / Robert Ng0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJonathan Lane / Mark Blons vs Tom Bunn / Jon Heyman6-0, 6-3
2025-09-13vs BC-AltaVista/CherylUnreinWon 30
W#1 DoublesRex Claridge / Steve Hirano vs James Do / Robert Ng7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLouis Altman / Gary Michel vs Ronald Chang / Jon Heyman6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMark Blons / Lee Breisacher vs Michael Kouyoumjian / Tom Bunn6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC Men - 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
David Stumfall
published 3.5
3.32
Steve Hirano
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Gary Michel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Lee Breisacher
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Jonathan Lane
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Rex Claridge
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Mark Blons
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.83
David Waite
published 3
Ian Forsyth
published 3
Louis Altman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Nam Lai
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Robert Stearns
published
Volker Wypyszyk
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steve Hirano + Rex Claridge7260% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
David Stumfall
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
3.35
Steve Hirano
8W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Gary Michel
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Lee Breisacher
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%13%87%
3.15
Jonathan Lane
8W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%20%80%
3.11
Rex Claridge
8W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.11
Mark Blons
8W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%23%77%
3.09
3
David Waite
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Ian Forsyth
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Louis Altman
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Nam Lai
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Robert Stearns
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Volker Wypyszyk
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.