Teams

Team 2 BoomerRacquets

2026 NOVA Adult 55 & Over · NOVA Adult 55 & Over 6.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-08-06vs Team 1 Net AssetsWon 30
W#1 DoublesMichelle O'Brien / Lyn Reid vs Joyce Aramburu / Theresa Jones6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLena Luo / Joanna Schindler vs Miriam Smolen / Lisa Ohlweiler6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJill Adler / Patti Sinnen vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-08-02vs Team 1 Net AssetsLost 12
L#1 DoublesMichelle O'Brien / Lyn Reid vs Jennifer Kroll / KERSTIN DEMKO2-6, 5-5
W#2 DoublesLucy Dong / Lena Luo vs Lena Ferris / Miriam Smolen6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLori Fisher / Laura Riesenberg vs Joyce Aramburu / Lisa Ohlweiler5-7, 2-6
2026-07-23vs Team 1 Net AssetsWon 30
W#1 DoublesDebra Ciesar / Sara Franklin vs Joyce Aramburu / Lisa Ohlweiler6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLena Luo / Patti Sinnen vs Paula Murphy / Kathleen Reilly-Olson6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJanice Zima / Joanna Schindler vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-07-18vs Team 1 Net AssetsLost 02
L#1 DoublesLucy Dong / Lori Fisher vs Joyce Aramburu / Theresa Jones3-6, 5-5
L#2 DoublesJanice Zima / Laura Riesenberg vs Lisa Ohlweiler / KERSTIN DEMKO1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-07-10vs Team 1 Net AssetsWon 30
W#1 DoublesDebra Ciesar / Sara Franklin vs KERSTIN DEMKO / Jennifer Kroll6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichelle O'Brien / Patti Sinnen vs Joyce Aramburu / Theresa Jones6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLucy Dong / Lori Fisher vs Miriam Smolen / Paula Murphy6-4, 6-0
2026-07-07vs Team 1 Net AssetsWon 20
W#1 DoublesJill Adler / Michelle O'Brien vs Jennifer Kroll / Miriam Smolen6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLaura Riesenberg / Debra Ciesar vs Paula Murphy / Marcy Davidson6-3, 6-3
2026-06-28vs Team 1 Net AssetsWon 30
W#1 DoublesSara Franklin / Michelle O'Brien vs KERSTIN DEMKO / Jennifer Kroll6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDebra Ciesar / Lyn Reid vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJann Cassady / Lena Luo vs Paula Murphy / Kathleen Reilly-Olson6-0, 6-4
2026-06-23vs Team 1 Net AssetsWon 21
L#1 DoublesDebra Ciesar / Jann Cassady vs Lena Ferris / Theresa Jones4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMichelle O'Brien / Janice Zima vs Joyce Aramburu / Miriam Smolen7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLaura Riesenberg / Lori Fisher vs Paula Murphy / Karen Harriman6-1, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · NOVA Adult 55 & Over 6.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Team 2 BoomerRacquets6218611145

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
Lucy Dong
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.02
Lena Luo
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.00
Joanna Schindler
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.94
Sara Franklin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Lyn Reid
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Jann Cassady
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.85
Patti Sinnen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.85
Janice Zima
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.80
Jill Adler
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.75
Debra Ciesar
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.68
Laura Riesenberg
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Lori Fisher
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lucy Dong + Lena Luo2451% games−3.2% vs expected
Joanna Schindler + Debra Ciesar5257% gamesnot enough data
Laura Riesenberg + Lena Luo5161% gamesnot enough data
Lena Luo + Janice Zima314 matchesnot enough data
Debra Ciesar + Laura Riesenberg303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lucy Dong
7W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%40%60%
3.03
3
Lena Luo
51W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.02
3
Joanna Schindler
69W–70L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.00
Sara Franklin
5W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
68%32%<1%
2.94
Lyn Reid
13W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.90
Jann Cassady
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
80%20%<1%
2.89
3
Patti Sinnen
92W–115L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%87%12%
2.85
3
Janice Zima
231W–194L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
2.85
3
Jill Adler
108W–136L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Debra Ciesar
98W–91L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Laura Riesenberg
88W–73L career · 4 lines in 2026
9%91%1%
2.68
Lori Fisher
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.