Teams

Sushi Fighters/Rogers/Moraga

2025 Tri-Level 4.0 · 4.5

10 players · average NTRP 4.75 / NO. CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-03-22vs Gladiators/Jefferson/San RamonWon 21
W#1 DoublesDarrin Cohen / Alex Milosh Stephanovich vs Albert Godjali / Nishant Jain6-4, 1-2
L#2 DoublesArtem Melnik / Matthew Gross vs Jeremy Famularcano / Javier Lagarde7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSteve Lhi / Erik Amundson vs Andrew Huang / Shang Liu6-3, 6-3
2025-03-22vs NorCal/Ngo/Tri-Level4.0/4.5/5.0MWon 30
W#1 DoublesTimothy Rogers / Alex Milosh Stephanovich vs Daniel Harris / Andrew Ngo4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMatthew Gross / Barry Seeman vs Ashwin Seshadri Kalathur / Scott Monismith7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesErik Amundson / Marcelo Nunes vs Paul Shin / Henny Huang6-3, 6-4
2025-03-21vs Athan Downs/Mohan/San RamonWon 21
W#1 DoublesTimothy Rogers / Alex Milosh Stephanovich vs Adhitya Mohan / Sanjeev Sinha6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesBarry Seeman / Ryan Lehmer vs Mitchell Lum / Nicholas Saquilayan3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesGarizaldy Caabay / Steve Lhi vs Sejin Kwag / JZ Zhong7-5, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.14 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.55
Darrin Cohen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.48
Timothy Rogers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.24
Alex Milosh Stephanovich
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.22
Ryan Lehmer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.20
Artem Melnik
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.17
Barry Seeman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.87
Marcelo Nunes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.80
Steve Lhi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.76
Garizaldy Caabay
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Erik Amundson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Darrin Cohen
16W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
no projection at this level
4.55
Timothy Rogers
22W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%56%43%
4.48
5
Alex Milosh Stephanovich
4W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.24
Ryan Lehmer
14W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
4.22
4.5
Artem Melnik
10W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%2%
4.20
4.5
Barry Seeman
8W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
4.17
Marcelo Nunes
12W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
83%17%<1%
3.87
Steve Lhi
8W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.80
Garizaldy Caabay
24W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
96%4%<1%
3.76
Erik Amundson
7W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.