Teams

VDF String Queens - S. Cornell

2025 Hillsborough Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 Adult 18 & Over Day- Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
W#1 DoublesKaralee Kulek-Luzey / Vanvisa Cheung vs Carol Schweitzer / Ashley Reiss6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesBrittany Kissell vs Laurie Daigle6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesRobin Feocco / Mary Kampsen vs Sarah Clark / Ashley Terry4-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesLinda Frank / Mary Kampsen vs Susan Frisina / Sherise Hurst7-5, 7-6
L#1 SinglesBrittany Kissell vs Jennifer Wittenbauer1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDorimar Siverio-Minardi / Robin Feocco vs Stacy Leatherman / Devon Connell6-3, 6-3
L#1 DoublesSummer Popejoy / Vanvisa Cheung vs Siwon Jang / Erika Montanez2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesBrittany Kissell vs Sonia Cecilia Slaven2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMary Kampsen / Dorimar Siverio-Minardi vs Kathleen Daciek / Angie Shin4-6, 3-6
2025-01-24vs TYCC Party at the Net - M. JamesWon 21
W#1 DoublesKaralee Kulek-Luzey / Vanvisa Cheung vs Jennifer Burby / Sarah Lindbeck6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesBrittany Kissell vs Sarah Boe6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDorimar Siverio-Minardi / Summer Popejoy vs Margaux Parizeau / Haley Lorenzen3-6, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Adult 18 & Over Day- Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.30 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.86
Brittany Kissell
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.50
Helena Taranoff
published
2.37
Karalee Kulek-Luzey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.35
Vanvisa Cheung
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.32
Robin Feocco
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.24
Mary Dressler
published
2.06
Dorimar Siverio-Minardi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.04
Mary Kampsen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
1.96
Linda Frank
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Rosella Nelson
published
Summer Popejoy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Dressler + Helena Taranoff314 matchesnot enough data
Mary Kampsen + Dorimar Siverio-Minardi123 matchesnot enough data
Helena Taranoff + Robin Feocco123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Brittany Kissell
22W–8L career · type A · 4 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
2.86
Helena Taranoff
9W–6L career · no lines in 2025
0%50%50%
2.50
Karalee Kulek-Luzey
10W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%82%18%
2.37
Vanvisa Cheung
13W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%85%15%
2.35
Robin Feocco
12W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%90%10%
2.32
Mary Dressler
7W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.24
Dorimar Siverio-Minardi
2W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.06
Mary Kampsen
4W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.04
Linda Frank
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.96
Rosella Nelson
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Summer Popejoy
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.