Teams

KY/LOU/GROVE/WILKINS

2025 USTA LEAGUE 40 & Over ADULT LOUISVILLE · 4.0 Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.75 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-01-10vs KY/LOU/PRZEWORSKI/LANEWon 40
W#1 DoublesMarti Wilkins / Sarah Scheetz vs Christine Przeworski / Elena Marquette6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesNoel Kaufmann vs Olga Snyder6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLaurie Moore / Nancy Fetz vs Soojung Jung / Emily Nolan6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJennifer G Wood / Lisa Gustafson vs Kathleen Lane / Leah Montgomery6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Noel Kaufmann
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.98
Marti Wilkins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.89
Lisa Gustafson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.88
Sarah Scheetz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.88
Madge Dennis
published
3.87
Jennifer G Wood
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.83
Gloria Hoffmann
published
3.83
Ellen Baldwin
published
3.79
Martha Stephenson
published
3.70
Kelli Gordinier
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.66
Pilar Miron
published
3.61
Nancy Fetz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Anne Grove
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
Robin Snook
published
Leslie Strahl
published
Whitney McNicol
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marti Wilkins + Gloria Hoffmann404 matchesnot enough data
Martha Stephenson + Gloria Hoffmann213 matchesnot enough data
Noel Kaufmann + Ellen Baldwin213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Noel Kaufmann
26W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%45%55%
4.02
Marti Wilkins
29W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%56%44%
3.98
Lisa Gustafson
21W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%78%21%
3.89
Sarah Scheetz
11W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.88
Madge Dennis
15W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.88
Jennifer G Wood
7W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.87
Gloria Hoffmann
13W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
Ellen Baldwin
26W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
Martha Stephenson
23W–21L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Kelli Gordinier
66W–51L career · 5 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.70
Pilar Miron
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.66
Nancy Fetz
17W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.61
3.5
Anne Grove
28W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Robin Snook
7W–9L career · no lines in 2025
91%9%<1%
3.31
Leslie Strahl
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Whitney McNicol
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.