Teams

DiSanti-2.5-GC

2026 Team Singles Tournament-PB · 2.5 W

6 players · average NTRP / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-03-01vs Gartman-2.5-GCWon 20
W#1 SinglesLauren Purvis vs Robyn Johnson6-0, 6-4
W#2 SinglesKaty Boyer vs Kelly Robinson6-3, 6-2
2026-03-01vs Bayati-2.5W-JXNLost 03
L#1 SinglesKaty Boyer vs Kari Thomas2-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesStephenie Baker vs Olivia Barnard3-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesTracey Mathews vs Kaiti Stewart0-6, 0-6
2026-02-28vs Thurman-2.5W-SWWon 20
W#1 SinglesLauren Purvis vs Shelby Powell6-3, 7-6
W#3 SinglesTracy Jackson-Wilson vs Ashlyn Gatlin2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-02-28vs Whittle-2.5-NELost 02
L#1 SinglesLauren Purvis vs Reika Sato3-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesStephenie Baker vs Kayla Reynolds5-7, 1-6
2026-02-28vs Walley-2.5-PBWon 21
W#1 SinglesKaty Boyer vs Ivey Holder6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesTracy Jackson-Wilson vs Bayley Alexander6-1, 7-6
L#3 SinglesTracey Mathews vs Haley Walley0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.33 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.63
Lauren Purvis
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.42
Katy Boyer
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.42
Stephenie Baker
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.34
Tracy Jackson-Wilson
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
1.83
Tracey Mathews
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Mary Anne DiSanti
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephenie Baker + Tracey Mathews2342% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren Purvis
16W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%18%82%
2.63
Katy Boyer
26W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%71%29%
2.42
Stephenie Baker
29W–40L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%72%28%
2.42
Tracy Jackson-Wilson
19W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%87%13%
2.34
Tracey Mathews
9W–31L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.83
Mary Anne DiSanti
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.