Teams

Lost Forest - Lumberjacks

*2026 Houston Fall League (2025) NA - Monday Men's Singles · 3.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-11-10vs Lost Forest - BuzzsawsWon 21
L#1 SinglesCHARLES HILDEBRAND vs Eric Guerrero6-7, 4-6
W#2 SinglesJack Sheahan vs Michael Whelen7-5, 6-3
W#4 SinglesDavid Christensen vs David Jin6-1, 6-1
2025-11-03vs Lost Forest - BuzzsawsLost 03
L#2 SinglesDavid Christensen vs Eric Guerrero2-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesChris Keen vs Chirag Amin3-6, 0-6
L#4 SinglesJosh Freedkin vs Maylon Atchison3-6, 0-6
2025-10-27vs Lost Forest - BuzzsawsWon 21
L#2 SinglesJosh Freedkin vs Chirag Amin3-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesDavid Christensen vs David Jin6-3, 6-1
W#4 SinglesCHARLES HILDEBRAND vs Joe Dowell6-3, 6-2
2025-10-20vs Lost Forest - BuzzsawsLost 12
L#1 SinglesJack Sheahan vs Ruben Venegas2-6, 6-7
L#2 SinglesDavid Christensen vs Michael Whelen0-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesChris Keen vs David Jin6-3, 6-4
2025-10-13vs Lost Forest - BuzzsawsSplit 22
W#1 SinglesCHARLES HILDEBRAND vs Ruben Venegas6-3, 6-4
L#2 SinglesDavid Christensen vs Kevin Guan3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 SinglesJosh Freedkin vs Joe Dowell2-6, 5-7
W#4 SinglesJack Sheahan vs Maylon Atchison6-1, 6-2
2025-10-06vs Lost Forest - BuzzsawsWon 21
L#1 SinglesJeffery Wilson vs Micah Egiefameh4-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesCHARLES HILDEBRAND vs Michael Lee6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#4 SinglesJosh Freedkin vs Maylon Atchison7-5, 6-3
2025-09-29vs Lost Forest - BuzzsawsWon 21
W#1 SinglesCHARLES HILDEBRAND vs Kevin Guan6-4, 6-3
L#3 SinglesChris Keen vs Chirag Amin0-6, 2-6
W#4 SinglesJosh Freedkin vs David Jin6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.05
CHARLES HILDEBRAND
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 20% · published 3
2.87
Jack Sheahan
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.84
Jeffery Wilson
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.73
Josh Freedkin
usually #4 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
2.68
David Christensen
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #4 Singles 20% · published 3
2.54
Chris Keen
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
Michael Schelbert
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeffery Wilson + CHARLES HILDEBRAND0533% gamesnot enough data
Michael Schelbert + CHARLES HILDEBRAND303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
CHARLES HILDEBRAND
22W–15L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.05
3
Jack Sheahan
4W–6L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
<1%85%15%
2.87
Jeffery Wilson
16W–42L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%89%10%
2.84
Josh Freedkin
3W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.73
3
David Christensen
3W–4L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
2.68
3
Chris Keen
4W–32L career · 3 lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
2.54
Michael Schelbert
5W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.