Teams

Mission - Jo Ann

2024 NA Valley Adult 18 & Over 2.5 W- 5.0 W - Fall · 3.0 Valley Ladies

14 players · average NTRP 3.17 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-11-15vs HEB - BiancaSplit 22
L#1 DoublesCelina Perez / Marla Cavazos vs Krista Banuelos / Cristina Estrella0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKyra Nasser / Lidia Showing vs Jaylynn Sanchez / Adele Clinton-Solis0-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesEstefania Arzate Almeraz vs Isamarie Rosado6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLizeth Sinecio / Blanca Vazquez vs OLGA Pena de Moreno / Monica Ramirez6-0, 6-1
2024-09-30vs HEB - BiancaSplit 22
L#1 DoublesMagaly Monaco / Blanca Vazquez vs Cristina Estrella / Monica Ramirez0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesILEANA MENDEZ / Kyra Nasser vs Adele Clinton-Solis / Ana Rangel3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 SinglesEstefania Arzate Almeraz vs Isamarie Rosado6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLicia Cerrate-Reinoso / Crystina Garza vs OLGA Pena de Moreno / Krista Banuelos6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Valley Ladies have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Estefania Arzate Almeraz
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.87
Blanca Vazquez
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.82
Margaret Villegas
published
2.81
2.75
Licia Cerrate-Reinoso
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Anna Abrego
published 3
Crystina Garza
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.59
Lidia Showing
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.58
Lizeth Sinecio
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.56
Kyra Nasser
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
ILEANA MENDEZ
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jo Ann Newman
published
Magaly Monaco
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Marla Cavazos
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kyra Nasser + Margaret Villegas123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Estefania Arzate Almeraz
13W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%9%91%
3.19
3.5
Blanca Vazquez
11W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
82%18%<1%
2.87
Margaret Villegas
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Veronica De La Fuente
15W–9L career · no lines in 2025
0%1%99%
2.81
Licia Cerrate-Reinoso
6W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Anna Abrego
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Crystina Garza
3W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Lidia Showing
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
25%74%<1%
2.59
Lizeth Sinecio
6W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
28%72%<1%
2.58
Kyra Nasser
4W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
34%65%<1%
2.56
ILEANA MENDEZ
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jo Ann Newman
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Magaly Monaco
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Marla Cavazos
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.