Teams

Hickman/Fayetteville/SRC

2025 Combo 40 & Over 5.5, 7.5 · 7.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-09-17vs Schaller-Overton/Rogers/PCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesSusan Akins / Kelly Edmiaston vs Colleen Daniels / Suzanne Lankford6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesGena Stagg / Angela Alpe vs Carrie Overton / Libby Schaller6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKaren HIckman / Teresa Killough vs Sharon Gunter / Melissa Ocarroll1-6, 0-6
2025-09-11vs Rickard-Wilson/Centerton/KTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesSusan Akins / Kelly Edmiaston vs Amanda Infante / Nellie Jones2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesGena Stagg / Kristy Maher vs Heather Wewers / Kimberly Rickard6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesGwendy Lefforge / Teresa Killough vs Elena Olson / Ginger Butcher1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Susan Akins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.64
Kristy Maher
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Jamia Weir
published
3.33
Shirley Karr
published
3.31
Nancy Ellman
published
3.28
Kelly Edmiaston
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Teresa Killough
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Angela Alpe
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Karen HIckman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Gwendy Lefforge
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Gena Stagg
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Rebecca Williams
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly Edmiaston + Jamia Weir3245% games−1.9% vs expected
Karen HIckman + Shirley Karr4158% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susan Akins
25W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
Kristy Maher
22W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
15%84%1%
3.64
Jamia Weir
36W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
Shirley Karr
18W–15L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Nancy Ellman
14W–12L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Kelly Edmiaston
14W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Teresa Killough
14W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
95%5%<1%
3.27
3.5
Angela Alpe
5W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Karen HIckman
7W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.13
Gwendy Lefforge
13W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.09
Gena Stagg
8W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rebecca Williams
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.