Teams

GJTC WSMITH

2022 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - WS · WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER - WS

9 players · average NTRP / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-05-20vs GJTC SHURTLost 23
L#1 DoublesROBIN MARTIN / Wendy Smith vs Valerie Lambdin / Kathy Ludlam2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesLaurie Rink vs Shelly Hurt6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAngela Padalecki / Sarah Menge vs Maggie Coleman / Eileen Arja3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 SinglesJennifer Bradfield vs Tammy Bishop6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMonica Hudson / Lauren Lewis vs Hua Zhao / Vicky MacH1-6, 0-6
2022-05-12vs GJTC CMEILWon 31
W#1 DoublesJennifer Bradfield / Sarah Menge vs Stephanie Bailey / Melissa Reams6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAngela Padalecki vs Claire Meil0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesLaurie Rink / Wendy Smith vs Jessica Milo / Natasha Snider6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesROBIN MARTIN / Monica Hudson vs Kris Meil / Rebecca Glasser6-4, 6-4
2022-05-05vs GJTC DBEEHLERWon 32
L#1 DoublesRYLEE MARTIN / Lauren Lewis vs Laura Mourning / Amy Fife4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesROBIN MARTIN vs Janel Tanner6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSarah Menge / Angela Padalecki vs Michelle Killian / Lorene Ramirez6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 SinglesNikki Hanks vs Christi Reece6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesWendy Smith / Jennifer Bradfield vs Diana Beehler / Julie Johnson6-0, 1-6, 1-0
2022-04-28vs GJTC MBARNHURSTLost 05
L#1 DoublesLauren Lewis / Wendy Smith vs Lisa Belnap / Celeste Quarnberg2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesSarah Menge vs Megan Barnhurst1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAngela Padalecki / Nikki Hanks vs Val Kennedy / Leia Hillan0-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesMonica Hudson vs Jeena Jolley1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesROBIN MARTIN / RYLEE MARTIN vs Sarah Butterfield / Jill Harmon1-6, 0-6
2022-04-21vs GJTC ASHIDELERWon 41
L#1 DoublesAngela Padalecki / Sarah Menge vs Desirae DeGeus / Mandy Harter6-7, 1-6
W#1 SinglesJennifer Bradfield vs Vanessa Young6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesROBIN MARTIN / Monica Hudson vs Jaci Doughty / Aubrey Lee6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesRYLEE MARTIN vs Melanie Hylan6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesWendy Smith / Laurie Rink vs Kim Kintz / Megan Graves6-1, 6-2
2022-04-14vs GJTC JBOWENLost 23
L#1 DoublesLauren Lewis / Monica Hudson vs Susan Richardson / Debbie Sutherland2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesLaurie Rink vs Kelly Morse6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesROBIN MARTIN / RYLEE MARTIN vs Stacey Marshall / Renee Williams7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesNikki Hanks vs Meredith Gardner0-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJennifer Bradfield / Wendy Smith vs Janalee Bowen / Gisela Ferguson2-6, 2-6
2022-04-07vs GJTC HBERGERSplit 22
W#1 DoublesNikki Hanks / Jennifer Bradfield vs Laura Traver / Amy Swonger6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMonica Hudson / Lauren Lewis vs Lyudmyla Miller / Abbie Siegmund2-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesROBIN MARTIN vs Amanda Calvert1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesAngela Padalecki / Sarah Menge vs Erin Blue / Jamie Montgomery6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER - WS have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
Lauren Lewis
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.05
Jennifer Bradfield
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.00
Laurie Rink
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.95
Monica Hudson
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.76
ROBIN MARTIN
usually #2 Doubles 29%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
2.44
RYLEE MARTIN
usually #2 Singles 25%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Angela Padalecki
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Nikki Hanks
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Sarah Menge
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Monica Hudson + Lauren Lewis14659% games+7.5% vs expected
ROBIN MARTIN + Jennifer Bradfield5455% games+3.5% vs expected
ROBIN MARTIN + RYLEE MARTIN3443% games−5.2% vs expected
Angela Padalecki + Sarah Menge134 matchesnot enough data
Laurie Rink + Monica Hudson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren Lewis
46W–19L career · 5 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Jennifer Bradfield
57W–33L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%34%66%
3.05
Laurie Rink
30W–10L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%50%50%
3.00
Monica Hudson
54W–33L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
2.95
ROBIN MARTIN
48W–57L career · 6 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
2.76
RYLEE MARTIN
6W–9L career · 4 lines in 2022
69%31%<1%
2.44
Angela Padalecki
1W–5L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Nikki Hanks
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sarah Menge
2W–4L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.