Teams

Walker/Moss

Spring Mixed Doubles Flex League · 3.0

1 player · average NTRP / TENNESSEE

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings15 teams · 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Armor/Bronchtein6060123
2Jennings/Miller6060131
3Buliga/Rogers6161451
4Appiah-Opoku/Burden5151226
5Duncan/Williamson5353670
6Walker/Moss4242544
7Vandever3131223
8Zemenick/Rhodes3232546
9Fresh Fuzz3333641
10EJS Tennis2424962
11Holy/Priest16161282
12Forrest/Horn0101213
13Mighty Carls05051057
14Tram05051061
15Aces High06061276

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.70
Rachel Walker
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rachel Walker
16W–19L career · no lines in 2026
8%91%2%
2.70

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.