Teams

Duval - Groce (HH)

2023 Duval Adult 55 & Over - Women Winter · 8.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women

7 players · average NTRP 4.50 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-03-26Won 10
W#3 DoublesMichelle Jahn / Maureen Kennedy vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-02-25vs MuehlWon 20
W#1 DoublesKarin Fletcher / Lisa Goodrich vs Nina Appleby / Reiko Sheridan6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesEllen Dyal / Wenying Xu vs Karen Meyer / Michiele Sherman7-6, 0-6, 1-0
2023-02-18vs MuehlWon 21
W#1 DoublesLisa Goodrich / Karin Fletcher vs Michiele Sherman / Arlene Muehl6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesEllen Dyal / Sharon Hapsis vs Karen Meyer / Stephanie Carr3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMichelle Jahn / Danette Jarriel vs Jacqueline Harris / BEATRICE PLUMMER6-3, 6-4
2023-02-04vs MuehlLost 12
W#1 DoublesKarin Fletcher / Lisa Goodrich vs Nina Appleby / Kathleen Pinho6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSharon Hapsis / Kelly Groce vs Jacqueline Harris / BEATRICE PLUMMER7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDanette Jarriel / Michelle Jahn vs Stephanie Carr / Arlene Muehl2-6, 6-7
2023-01-28vs MuehlSplit 11
L#2 DoublesSharon Hapsis / Wenying Xu vs Arlene Muehl / Michiele Sherman4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKelly Groce / Ellen Dyal vs BEATRICE PLUMMER / Kathleen Pinho1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-01-14vs MuehlWon 20
W#1 DoublesSharon Hapsis / Eileen Edsall vs Margaret Grantham / Debra Sutton6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKelly Groce / Ellen Dyal vs Reiko Sheridan / BEATRICE PLUMMER4-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Ellen Dyal
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.71
Raquel Clark
published
3.43
Lisa Goodrich
published
3.42
Michelle Jahn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Eileen Edsall
published
Karin Fletcher
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Sharon Hapsis
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Jahn + Ellen Dyal213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Ellen Dyal
69W–58L career · 4 lines in 2023
95%5%<1%
3.77
Raquel Clark
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.71
Lisa Goodrich
9W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
3.43
Michelle Jahn
68W–143L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%72%28%
3.42
Eileen Edsall
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Karin Fletcher
21W–14L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Sharon Hapsis
79W–57L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.