Teams

High Point/Villalobos W4.0S

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Saturday League

24 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
W#1 DoublesJannine Soldan / Theresa Batoon vs Molly Pruner / Carrie Hoogendoorn7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesValerie van Ausdall / Nidia Bridges vs Jill Fietz / Nina Konstans7-5, 6-3
L#2 SinglesMelanie Truxal vs Priscila Vidal6-0, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesNycole Vu / Gina Paterno Villalobos vs Kaylea Schultz / Karen Pannell6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for S W. Saturday League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 21 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.99
Kristen Aragon
published
3.95
Sue Lopez de Correia
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.94
Ha Tran
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.88
Roz Erlewein
published
3.87
Maria Caldwell
published
3.86
Nycole Vu
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.85
Beth Parks
published 4
3.78
Katherine Motlagh
published
3.75
3.75
Valerie van Ausdall
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.75
Jannine Soldan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.74
Jill Nail
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.73
Katie Tran
published
3.73
Nidia Bridges
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.69
Denise Lu
published 4
3.68
Theresa Batoon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.66
Diane Hashimoto
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.63
Gina Paterno Villalobos
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
Shannon Craig
published
3.58
Duang-Nate TRISARNSRI
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.42
Suzanne Kim
published
Melanie Truxal
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Rita Wilson
published
Therese Blackburn
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maria Caldwell + Kristen Aragon7459% games+8.0% vs expected
Beth Parks + Kristen Aragon9063% games+5.4% vs expected
Beth Parks + Jannine Soldan7063% games+3.0% vs expected
Sue Lopez de Correia + Ha Tran7259% games−1.5% vs expected
Diane Hashimoto + Ha Tran3649% games−4.6% vs expected
Nycole Vu + Denise Lu4156% gamesnot enough data
Sue Lopez de Correia + Kristen Aragon4158% gamesnot enough data
Katie Tran + Valerie van Ausdall224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristen Aragon
34W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.99
Sue Lopez de Correia
27W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.95
Ha Tran
26W–22L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.94
Roz Erlewein
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.88
Maria Caldwell
24W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.87
Nycole Vu
33W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
1%84%15%
3.86
4
Beth Parks
30W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.85
Katherine Motlagh
13W–14L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Alexandria Courtney
2W–3L career · type A · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
Valerie van Ausdall
12W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
Jannine Soldan
21W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
Jill Nail
5W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%92%3%
3.74
Katie Tran
18W–15L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Nidia Bridges
16W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Denise Lu
18W–17L career · no lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.69
Theresa Batoon
28W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Diane Hashimoto
15W–27L career · 5 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.66
Gina Paterno Villalobos
7W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.63
Shannon Craig
8W–7L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.60
Duang-Nate TRISARNSRI
23W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%29%71%
3.58
Suzanne Kim
5W–9L career · no lines in 2025
71%29%<1%
3.42
Melanie Truxal
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Rita Wilson
12W–18L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Therese Blackburn
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.