Teams

DBrantmeyer (PLCC)

2022 Combo Doubles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Combo 7.5 Men - Mon PM

11 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-10-03vs BChandra (Charlotte Indoor)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesWesley Wright / Marc Swann vs Scott MacIntosh / Mike Drezek7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2022-09-20vs RBombien (Mountainbrook)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesTodd Kasler / CJ ONeill vs Tai Kam / Mark Hodgson4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2022-09-19Won 10
W#2 DoublesMarcus Wege / CJ ONeill vs John Robinson / John Suther6-1, 6-2
2022-08-29vs JMarks (Providence CC)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesWayne Burgamy / Marcus Wege vs Jim Marks / Scott Sofsian5-7, 2-6
2022-08-23vs RTeat (Weddington)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMarcus Wege / Vijay Jagtap vs Simas Petrikis / Brett Diller4-6, 4-6
2022-08-19vs JAdams (Ballantyne Country Club)Split 11
L#1 DoublesMarcus Wege / Daniel Brostowicz vs Jeff Adams / Kenneth Baker4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCJ ONeill / Todd Kasler vs Steve Delorenzo / Anish Patel6-2, 6-2
2022-08-12vs RMarks (Blakeney)Won 10
W#2 DoublesMike Ferguson / CJ ONeill vs David Bartholomew / Robert Shore6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Combo 7.5 Men - Mon PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.22
Marcus Wege
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.53
CJ ONeill
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.47
Todd Kasler
published 3.5
3.38
Mike Ferguson
published
3.17
Donald VanCott
published 3.5
3.08
Marc Swann
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.03
Jim Boyles
published
2.99
Howard Pence
published 3.5
2.81
Wayne Burgamy
published
2.80
Rick Nicholson
published
Wesley Wright
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marc Swann + Howard Pence134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Marcus Wege
88W–46L career · 4 lines in 2022
5%94%2%
4.22
3.5
CJ ONeill
67W–52L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%41%59%
3.53
3.5
Todd Kasler
58W–37L career · no lines in 2022
<1%58%42%
3.47
Mike Ferguson
11W–9L career · no lines in 2022
82%18%<1%
3.38
3.5
Donald VanCott
7W–8L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Marc Swann
28W–49L career · 1 line in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.08
Jim Boyles
3W–9L career · no lines in 2022
42%58%<1%
3.03
3.5
Howard Pence
5W–10L career · no lines in 2022
54%46%<1%
2.99
Wayne Burgamy
2W–19L career · no lines in 2022
93%7%<1%
2.81
Rick Nicholson
0W–6L career · no lines in 2022
94%6%<1%
2.80
Wesley Wright
4W–14L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.