Teams

JLee (Colonel Beatty)

2023 Adult 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Adult 3.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-05-08vs CCox (Raintree)Won 10
W#2 DoublesHillary Kroboth / Brittany Marshall vs Shannon Cox / Diann Hickson7-5, 6-3
2023-05-03vs MKelling/RJoplin (Queens)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesTeresa Riley / Kris Jones vs Mitchell Kelling / Bridget Happney3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-04-19vs LHuntington (Park Road)Won 20
W#1 SinglesHillary Kroboth vs Lynne Herrin6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesTeresa Riley / Gabriella Sansone vs Marilyn Spencer / Punky Brick6-4, 6-2
2023-04-12vs LStrump (Palisades CC)Won 20
W#1 SinglesHillary Kroboth vs Christina Chen6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKris Jones / Teresa Riley vs LISA KRUSE / Amy MacDonnell6-3, 7-6
2023-04-05vs MMetzl (Sardis)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesKris Jones / Teresa Riley vs Patricia Phelan / Kiera Young3-6, 6-7
2023-03-29Won 10
W#1 DoublesJane Lee / Teresa Riley vs Laura Lucas / Holly Berg3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-03-15vs ERoach/SJPragasam (Jeff Adams)Split 11
L#1 SinglesHillary Kroboth vs Kristen Agee7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTeresa Riley / Kris Jones vs Elyse Maiorini / Erica Powell6-4, 7-6
2023-03-08vs MKelling/RJoplin (Queens)Won 10
W#3 DoublesTeresa Riley / Kris Jones vs Renay Joplin / Bridget Happney1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-03-01vs CCox (Raintree)Won 20
W#1 DoublesHillary Kroboth / Elisa Salim vs Niki Koesel / Tricia Shaw6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesTeresa Riley vs Kimberlee Curley6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Elisa Salim
published 4
3.38
Hillary Kroboth
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.33
Kris Jones
published
3.12
Maria Santamaria
published
2.96
Teresa Riley
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
Jane Lee
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Teresa Riley + Hillary Kroboth044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Elisa Salim
71W–27L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72
3.5
Hillary Kroboth
87W–52L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.38
Kris Jones
18W–17L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.33
3.5
Abitha Begum Mohammed Sherfudeen
18W–18L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
Maria Santamaria
5W–9L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.12
3
Teresa Riley
70W–74L career · 11 lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
2.96
Jane Lee
3W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.