Teams

MTS:Constantin

2025 NH Adult 55 & Over Men · 7.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NEW HAMPSHIRE

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-05-10vs BOSS:Nabinger:RougvieLost 12
L#1 DoublesRichard King / Scott Herstad vs Radu Stan / Robert Nabinger6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJames Scammon / Terry Gould vs Daniel Millstone / Ted Friedman3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesPeter Podesta / Richard Aseltine vs Tom Csatari / Rod Lovely7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2025-02-08vs BOSS:Nabinger:RougvieWon 21
W#1 DoublesBill Best / James Scammon vs Doug Phillips / Radu Stan6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesScott Herstad / Daniel Scharpf vs Ted Friedman / Daniel Millstone1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRichard Aseltine / Peter Podesta vs Scott Rappeport / Tom Csatari6-2, 6-3
2025-02-01vs BOSS:Nabinger:RougvieWon 30
W#1 DoublesRichard King / Scott Herstad vs Radu Stan / Michael Fokas6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTerry Gould / James Scammon vs Cliff Eskey / Ted Friedman7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRichard Aseltine / Peter Podesta vs Robert Rougvie / Tom Csatari6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Bill Best
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.28
Scott Herstad
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.26
James Scammon
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
Peter Podesta
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Daniel Scharpf
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Terry Gould
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Richard Aseltine
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
James Constantin
published 3
Richard King
published
Scott Reid
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

James Scammon + Scott Herstad3255% games+10.3% vs expected
Peter Podesta + Terry Gould7652% games+4.2% vs expected
James Scammon + Bill Best12458% games+2.3% vs expected
Richard Aseltine + Terry Gould7750% games+1.5% vs expected
Richard Aseltine + Scott Herstad141249% games−1.0% vs expected
Richard Aseltine + Peter Podesta71048% games−6.9% vs expected
Richard Aseltine + James Constantin134 matchesnot enough data
James Scammon + Terry Gould123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Bill Best
29W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.42
Scott Herstad
99W–83L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
James Scammon
33W–33L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.26
Peter Podesta
54W–88L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Daniel Scharpf
30W–46L career · 1 line in 2025
10%90%1%
3.17
Terry Gould
87W–132L career · 2 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
Richard Aseltine
50W–63L career · 3 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.09
3
James Constantin
21W–42L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Richard King
28W–52L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Scott Reid
2W–10L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.