Teams

LCTA65/Weinstein/CTC

USTA - 65 & Over · 65 & over Women 3.0

12 players · average NTRP 2.88 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-06-24vs LCTA65/Dalpee/SeabrookLost 12
L#1 DoublesCynthia Thomas / Doreen MacK vs Judy Gimson / Ruth Dalpee3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesBoo Collins / Mary Davis vs Kathleen OSullivan / Charlotte Willis6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesLisa Vadakin / Andrea Weinstein vs Karen Colonnese / Mary Fleck5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2026-06-17vs LCTA65/Bullock/Forest HillsLost 01
L#2 DoublesLisa Vadakin / Charlene Willis vs Gladys Summers / Ann Crocker-Carmichael0-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-06-10vs LCTA65/Greely/CTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesLisa Vadakin / Andrea Weinstein vs Alana Garnett / Lisa Funaro-DeLalla7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDoreen MacK / Cynthia Thomas vs Lynn Besancon / Amy McCandless6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLynn Moore / Trish Olson vs Linda Spratt / Lynn Manfred6-2, 6-0
2026-06-03vs LCTA65/Parisol/DotyLost 12
W#1 DoublesBoo Collins / Mary Davis vs Abby Abrego / Langley Lester4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCynthia Thomas / Lisa Vadakin vs Lynne Aoyama / Leslie Basner3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCharlene Willis / Lynn Moore vs Cindy Parisoli / Gloria Prindle1-6, 0-6
2026-05-20vs LCTA65/Dalpee/SeabrookLost 12
L#1 DoublesBoo Collins / Mary Davis vs Ruth Dalpee / Judy Gimson6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDoreen MacK / Cynthia Thomas vs Mary Fleck / Charlotte Willis0-2
W#3 DoublesLisa Vadakin / Andrea Weinstein vs Kathy Garber / Karen Colonnese6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2026-05-13vs LCTA65/Bullock/Forest HillsWon 21
W#1 DoublesBoo Collins / Mary Davis vs Laura Bullock / Bobbie Felder6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDoreen MacK / Cynthia Thomas vs Kay Lawley / Gladys Summers3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesRenie Forsberg / Andrea Weinstein vs Lynn Murdaugh / Ima Walters6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2026-05-06vs LCTA65/Greely/CTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesDoreen MacK / Cynthia Thomas vs Deborah Faulkner / Lisa Funaro-DeLalla7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMaxine Cooke / Mary Davis vs Alana Garnett / Joanne Johnston6-1, 7-6
W#3 DoublesLisa Vadakin / Andrea Weinstein vs Lynn Besancon / Amy McCandless6-2, 6-0
2026-05-05vs LCTA65/Parisol/DotySplit 11
L#1 DoublesTrish Olson / Lisa Vadakin vs Lynne Aoyama / Robin Vandermeyden7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMary Davis / Maxine Cooke vs Abby Abrego / Lisa Diedrick6-1, 6-1
2024-11-01vs LCTA65/Greely/CTCWon 20
W#1 DoublesCarol Poole / Charlene Willis vs Marian Greely / Linda Spratt6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLisa Vadakin / Jean Smith vs Andrea Weinstein / Kay Sawyer6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 65 & over Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.85
Lisa Vadakin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.84
Boo Collins
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.77
Renie Forsberg
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Cynthia Thomas
published 3
2.70
Maxine Cooke
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.60
Charlene Willis
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.52
Doreen MacK
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Andrea Weinstein
published 2.5
Kay Sawyer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sharon Skowronek
published
Susan Mock
published
Trish Olson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maxine Cooke + Cynthia Thomas11359% games+4.8% vs expected
Kay Sawyer + Andrea Weinstein5848% games−4.9% vs expected
Charlene Willis + Andrea Weinstein3648% games−7.6% vs expected
Charlene Willis + Maxine Cooke404 matchesnot enough data
Charlene Willis + Cynthia Thomas404 matchesnot enough data
Charlene Willis + Sharon Skowronek303 matchesnot enough data
Maxine Cooke + Kay Sawyer213 matchesnot enough data
Maxine Cooke + Andrea Weinstein213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisa Vadakin
36W–75L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
2.85
3
Boo Collins
43W–48L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
2.84
Renie Forsberg
18W–28L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Cynthia Thomas
41W–18L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Maxine Cooke
51W–30L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
2.70
3
Charlene Willis
25W–36L career · 3 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
2.60
Doreen MacK
26W–26L career · 5 lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
2.52
2.5
Andrea Weinstein
22W–34L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Kay Sawyer
8W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Sharon Skowronek
21W–26L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Susan Mock
31W–42L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Trish Olson
8W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.