Teams

BC-PVTC/JanetYoung

2021 Adult 18 & Over - Beach Cities · BC Women - 3.5

17 players · average NTRP 3.43 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-06-06vs BC-MiraCosta/LananaGoldsteinWon 10
W#1 DoublesRika Tanous / Carol Flick vs Julie Misch / Kristen Roath6-1, 6-3
2021-05-16vs BC-LLW-MCC/LeasaIrelandWon 10
W#1 DoublesCarol Flick / Rika Tanous vs Dawn Bush / Elizabeth Shelor6-4, 6-2
2021-04-25vs BC-WestEnd/DianeWoyanskyLost 01
L#1 DoublesKaren Anlauf / Rika Tanous vs Kelly Wong / Melina Symons1-6, 6-7
2021-04-11vs BC-MCC/AmySchmargenWon 10
W#1 DoublesRika Tanous / Carol Flick vs Lisa Handelman / Eileen Baral6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC Women - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Kristin Thomas
published
3.32
Rika Tanous
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.31
Gail Starinieri
published 3.5
3.30
Tricia Rapaport
published
3.29
Carrie Munsell
published 3.5
3.19
Bonni Ying
published 3.5
3.16
Janet Young
published
3.13
Linda Stone
published
3.13
Nina Abdo
published
3.13
Adrianne Kaufman
published 3.5
3.11
Rebecca Sommerstein
published
2.96
Elizabeth Lujambio
published 3.5
2.90
Kim Vallee
published
Dolly Pham
published 3
Jenny Forsyth
published
Lindsay DeLarme
published
Shari Sunada
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Stone + Tricia Rapaport224 matchesnot enough data
Carrie Munsell + Adrianne Kaufman213 matchesnot enough data
Rebecca Sommerstein + Janet Young123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristin Thomas
4W–5L career · no lines in 2021
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Rika Tanous
128W–103L career · 5 lines in 2021
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Gail Starinieri
4W–5L career · no lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.31
Tricia Rapaport
7W–7L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Carrie Munsell
7W–5L career · no lines in 2021
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Bonni Ying
2W–3L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.19
Janet Young
4W–9L career · no lines in 2021
11%88%<1%
3.16
Linda Stone
7W–10L career · no lines in 2021
16%84%<1%
3.13
Nina Abdo
5W–12L career · no lines in 2021
16%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Adrianne Kaufman
5W–6L career · type A · no lines in 2021
16%83%<1%
3.13
Rebecca Sommerstein
2W–3L career · no lines in 2021
20%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Elizabeth Lujambio
2W–11L career · no lines in 2021
62%38%<1%
2.96
Kim Vallee
0W–4L career · no lines in 2021
79%21%<1%
2.90
3
Dolly Pham
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Jenny Forsyth
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Lindsay DeLarme
0W–6L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Shari Sunada
2W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.