Teams

Dallas/JB/AP

2025 Tri-Court 18 & Over 2.5 Novice · 2.5 Tri-Level Novice

11 players · average NTRP 2.70 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-07-30vs Myers-Ishmael/JB/RPCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesChandler Kirkwood Eaves / Paige Shelton vs Jami Sharp / Jeanne Bailey1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKylie DeVries / Dani Ennis vs Alyssa Ishmael / Michelle Myers4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCathy Odom / Kelly Carrick vs Marvene Harrell / June Long0-6, 0-6
2025-06-30vs Myers-Ishmael/JB/RPCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesBailey Davis / Cathy Odom vs Arielle Nast / Jordan Loebach1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLindsay Massey / Dani Ennis vs Jeanne Bailey / Kristie Becker6-0, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMarieta Posey / Kylie DeVries vs Alyssa Ishmael / June Long6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Tri-Level Novice have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.23 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Cherry Dallas
published 3.5
2.55
Kylie DeVries
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Bailey Davis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.20
Dani Ennis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.16
Lindsay Massey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.07
Chandler Kirkwood Eaves
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.00
Kelly Carrick
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
1.83
Cathy Odom
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
1.68
Lynette Chastain
published
Marieta Posey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Paige Shelton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cathy Odom + Kelly Carrick1430% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cherry Dallas
15W–13L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Kylie DeVries
27W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%36%64%
2.55
2.5
Bailey Davis
1W–4L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Dani Ennis
4W–4L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.20
Lindsay Massey
9W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
0%99%1%
2.16
2.5
Chandler Kirkwood Eaves
3W–8L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.07
Kelly Carrick
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.00
2.5
Cathy Odom
3W–6L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.83
Lynette Chastain
1W–7L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.68
Marieta Posey
2W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Paige Shelton
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.