Teams

CDTA S A18W3.5 8Centennial Harrison Sun 11 $20

CDTA 1Summer Adult 18 & Over wknd · nght

17 players · average NTRP 3.50 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#2 DoublesRemenisa Masa / Carrie Diamond vs Ruta Jones / Barbara Morrison5-7, 6-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDenise de Silva / Nancy Spring vs Cecilia Lauterbach / Samantha Warner6-7, 0-5
L#2 DoublesDenise de Silva / Remenisa Masa vs Nicole Toft / Mary Gutowski-Hazzard1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesNancy Dolan vs Amy Noble2-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesDenise de Silva / Remenisa Masa vs Allison Milmoe / Camille Prindle4-6, 6-5
L#1 SinglesNancy Dolan vs Denise Rippetoe-Reed1-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesMaggie Lampe / Ann Roberts vs Amy Byrne / Cathi Cappas7-6, 1-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJessica Gross / Stephanie Adam vs Anne Lewis / Jennifer Cicciu6-4, 4-5
W#1 DoublesJessica Gross / Nancy Dolan vs Anne Ryan / Laura Knapp7-6, 4-2
W#2 DoublesStephanie Adam / Sarah Haas vs Laura Swim / Liz Voller6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesNancy Spring / Meredith Mazur vs Jolie Davis / Catie Burns6-3, 7-5
2025-05-24Split 11
W#1 DoublesCarrie Diamond / Liz Hayes vs Susan Ellison / Hillary Cohen6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJessica Gross / Nancy Dolan vs Anne Gallagher / Vicki Johnson1-6, 5-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSarah Haas / Nancy Dolan vs Laura Cherry / Anna Swanson3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesChristi Harrison / Nancy Spring vs Kathryn Lentz / Nikki Veen7-6, 3-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for nght have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Meshelle Rich
published 4
3.46
Claudine Seidel
published 3.5
3.46
Tina Cid
published 3.5
3.45
Carrie Diamond
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.39
Jessica Gross
published 3.5
3.37
Liz Hayes
published 3.5
3.29
Claire Tramm
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
3.28
Jeanne Tromp
published 3.5
3.26
Maggie Lampe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Denise de Silva
published 3.5
Ann Roberts
published 3.5
3.25
Christi Harrison
published 3.5
3.12
Nancy Dolan
usually #1 Doubles 20%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
2.98
Nancy Spring
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Meredith Mazur
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Remenisa Masa
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Stephanie Adam
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christi Harrison + Stephanie Adam5157% games+10.3% vs expected
Christi Harrison + Jeanne Tromp3548% games+5.5% vs expected
Liz Hayes + Carrie Diamond7360% games+5.3% vs expected
Jessica Gross + Meshelle Rich17563% games+0.6% vs expected
Nancy Dolan + Christi Harrison4153% games−1.0% vs expected
Nancy Spring + Christi Harrison5252% games−1.7% vs expected
Nancy Dolan + Denise de Silva5549% gamesnot enough data
Maggie Lampe + Liz Hayes8067% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Meshelle Rich
38W–15L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.71
3.5
Claudine Seidel
43W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.46
3.5
Tina Cid
83W–29L career · no lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Carrie Diamond
12W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Jessica Gross
74W–47L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Liz Hayes
25W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
3.37
3
Claire Tramm
29W–7L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.29
3.5
Jeanne Tromp
144W–60L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Maggie Lampe
18W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Denise de Silva
17W–18L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Ann Roberts
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Christi Harrison
54W–48L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Nancy Dolan
68W–82L career · 4 lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
3.12
Nancy Spring
11W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.98
Meredith Mazur
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Remenisa Masa
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Stephanie Adam
11W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.