Teams

KMabe-HR

2025 Eno River Combo 40 & Over · 40 & Over Combo 8.5 Women Day

14 players · average NTRP 3.94 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-10-06vs ALeinbach-CHTCLost 01
L#3 DoublesLaura Privalle / Donna Ware vs Vicky Arne / Dayna Kelly1-6, 3-6
2025-09-29vs ALeinbach-CHTCSplit 11
L#2 DoublesTracy Fletcher / Kay Mabe vs Kristin Lahey / Adrianne Leinbach0-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMary Feger / Elizabeth Wyngaarden vs Dayna Kelly / Susan Lebowitz6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2025-09-22vs ALeinbach-CHTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesBeth Huebner / Donna Ware vs Kristin Lahey / Susan Lebowitz6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCarrie Couto / Julie Spearman vs Adrianne Leinbach / Shannon Lawrence6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKay Mabe / Erin Reiter vs Vicky Arne / Nhon Nicole Cobb5-7, 2-6
2025-09-15vs ALeinbach-CHTCLost 02
L#2 DoublesErin Reiter / Carrie Couto vs Lori Petty / Susan Lebowitz0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDonna Ware / Elizabeth Wyngaarden vs Brook Holton Sheahan / Dayna Kelly0-6, 4-6
2025-09-08vs ALeinbach-CHTCSplit 11
W#2 DoublesCarrie Couto / Julie Spearman vs Lori Petty / Kimber Barnett6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesNancee Merritt / Elizabeth Wyngaarden vs Dayna Kelly / Susan Lebowitz0-6, 2-6
2025-08-25vs ALeinbach-CHTCLost 02
L#2 DoublesCarrie Couto / Mary Feger vs Sarah Grant / Brook Holton Sheahan1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesDonna Ware / Elizabeth Wyngaarden vs Kimber Barnett / Torey Wahlstrom2-6, 5-7
2025-08-18vs ALeinbach-CHTCLost 01
L#3 DoublesJulie Spearman / Kay Mabe vs Shannon Lawrence / Vicky Arne1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Combo 8.5 Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.24
Katie Neal
published
4.09
Beth Huebner
published 4
3.96
Mary Feger
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.80
Kay Mabe
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.79
Julie Spearman
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.63
Nancee Merritt
published
3.59
Carrie Couto
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.58
Melissa Lutz
published
3.57
Laura Privalle
published
3.56
Tracy Fletcher
published
3.54
Beth Loeb
published 4
3.45
Elizabeth Wyngaarden
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.39
Erin Reiter
published
3.26
Donna Ware
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kay Mabe + Julie Spearman13853% games+9.6% vs expected
Beth Huebner + Carrie Couto6453% games+8.2% vs expected
Mary Feger + Carrie Couto171354% games+4.1% vs expected
Carrie Couto + Elizabeth Wyngaarden171547% games−0.5% vs expected
Kay Mabe + Beth Loeb6749% games−2.6% vs expected
Beth Loeb + Donna Ware31436% games−3.5% vs expected
Julie Spearman + Carrie Couto12759% games−4.2% vs expected
Kay Mabe + Elizabeth Wyngaarden91150% games−5.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katie Neal
13W–5L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
4.24
4
Beth Huebner
37W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
4.09
4
Mary Feger
125W–65L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.96
4
Kay Mabe
139W–143L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Julie Spearman
167W–84L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
Nancee Merritt
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.63
4
Carrie Couto
162W–176L career · 8 lines in 2025
25%74%<1%
3.59
Melissa Lutz
7W–8L career · no lines in 2025
28%71%<1%
3.58
Laura Privalle
16W–24L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.57
Tracy Fletcher
7W–9L career · no lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.56
4
Beth Loeb
124W–157L career · no lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.54
4
Elizabeth Wyngaarden
111W–133L career · 6 lines in 2025
65%35%<1%
3.45
Erin Reiter
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
78%22%<1%
3.39
3.5
Donna Ware
100W–185L career · 6 lines in 2025
3%92%4%
3.26

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.