Teams

RC DAVENPORT

2025 FW Adult 18 & Over League - Ladies · Friday Ladies 2.5

12 players · average NTRP 2.62 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-04-18vs BIR CONRAD/LINGTONWon 21
L#1 DoublesChandler Hallum / Brooke Green vs Kayli Conrad / Shannon Morgan6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMeghan Juba vs Dahlia Wright6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCatherine Davenport / Kathryn Little vs Samantha Dubeck / Erica Hasley6-1, 6-3
2025-04-06vs MCL MEYER/THOMASWon 30
W#1 DoublesChandler Hallum / Catherine Davenport vs Tyler Hightower / Ambree Smith6-4, 7-6
W#1 SinglesMeghan Juba vs Susan Cole6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBrooke Green / Lee Hallman vs Hilaire Baumgartner / Christine Gores6-4, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Friday Ladies 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.39 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.79
Meghan Juba
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.60
Jessica Biggs
published
2.47
Chandler Hallum
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.42
Kathryn Little
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.32
Jennifer McLeland
published
2.31
Ashli East
published 2.5
Candace Pitcock
published 2.5
2.18
Brooke Green
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
2.01
Lauren Bechtel
published
Holly Mccarty
published
Lauren Whitson
published
Lee Hallman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ashli East + Chandler Hallum134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Meghan Juba
6W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
Jessica Biggs
8W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%24%76%
2.60
3
Chandler Hallum
6W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
2.47
Kathryn Little
10W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%72%28%
2.42
Jennifer McLeland
5W–9L career · no lines in 2025
0%90%10%
2.32
2.5
Ashli East
3W–9L career · no lines in 2025
0%91%9%
2.31
2.5
Candace Pitcock
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Brooke Green
4W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.18
Lauren Bechtel
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.01
Holly Mccarty
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lauren Whitson
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lee Hallman
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.