Teams

CKing (Life Time)

2026 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Combo 6.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.05 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-09-02vs LCulp (Park Road)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesTeresa Riley / Ann Marie Selee vs Kristin Baker / Anne Morgan2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChristine King / Amanda DuBose vs Sara DeVries / Lauren Culp1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLuz Lim / Amy Rottman vs Shannon Eagan / Sarah Cunningham6-0, 6-4
2026-08-19vs ELeMaitre (Park Road)Won 21
L#1 DoublesTeresa Riley / Christine King vs Brittany Ross / Lauren Horton5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAnn Marie Selee / Amy Rottman vs Lori Cowan / Betina Philip6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAvani Bhamidipati / Julie Dailly vs Enjolique LeMaitre / Vanessa Purnell6-1, 7-5
2026-08-12vs MMohammed/SAliota (Carmel)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesKirsten Rodgers / Amy Ballaban vs SUSAN ALIOTA / Rebecca Fitzsimons4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesTeresa Riley / Ann Marie Selee vs Carrie Kramer / Laurie Diman3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRaegan Wright / Amy Rottman vs Tara Walker / Jessica Babinski3-6, 4-6
2026-08-05vs LQuattlebaum/Mullins (OPRC)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesRaegan Wright / Valeria Gonzalez vs Naomi O'Brien / Anne Schmitt4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAmanda DuBose / Julie Dailly vs Marie Shuford / Anita Matai2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLuz Lim / Amy Rottman vs Amber Nee / Marise Kumar3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings35 teams · 18 & Over Combo 6.5 Women
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.16
Valeria Gonzalez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Yesenia Berges
published 3.5
3.01
Amanda DuBose
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.00
Kirsten Rodgers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.99
Teresa Riley
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.78
Ann Marie Selee
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.76
Trisha Hyso
published
2.76
Julie Dailly
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.75
Amy Ballaban
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Avani Bhamidipati
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Luz Lim
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Christine King
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.71
Amy Rottman
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.70
Raegan Wright
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Dailly + Teresa Riley4251% games+5.2% vs expected
Amy Rottman + Luz Lim2443% gamesnot enough data
Amanda DuBose + Christine King2348% gamesnot enough data
Christine King + Avani Bhamidipati224 matchesnot enough data
Yesenia Berges + Luz Lim303 matchesnot enough data
Julie Dailly + Christine King213 matchesnot enough data
Teresa Riley + Amy Ballaban123 matchesnot enough data
Amy Rottman + Christine King033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Valeria Gonzalez
1W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Yesenia Berges
21W–37L career · no lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.13
3
Amanda DuBose
22W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.01
Kirsten Rodgers
1W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
50%50%<1%
3.00
3
Teresa Riley
71W–75L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
2.99
3
Ann Marie Selee
39W–51L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.78
Trisha Hyso
6W–5L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Julie Dailly
47W–84L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%95%3%
2.76
3
Amy Ballaban
43W–32L career · 1 line in 2026
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Avani Bhamidipati
33W–35L career · 1 line in 2026
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Luz Lim
50W–69L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Christine King
30W–52L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Amy Rottman
30W–51L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
2.71
3
Raegan Wright
17W–37L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
2.70

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.