Teams

Terminetters

2026 COMBO · Women 9.5

10 players · average NTRP 4.62 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-06-14vs Sandbaggers AnonymousSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMichelle DaCosta / Lauren Villegas vs Catherine Babbitt / Laila Leist-Alston6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesVirginia Kaklamani / Danielle Spencer vs Ariel Aung / Jessey Martinez4-6, 0-6
2026-06-13vs Sandbaggers AnonymousWon 21
W#1 DoublesAllison Byrnes / Kirstin Clark vs Sara Thompson / Claudia Samaniego6-0, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichelle DaCosta / Ruth Lawson vs KELLY COOPER / Stacey Boebel2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesShelly Works / Danielle Spencer vs Diana Riechel / Jessey Martinez6-2, 6-2
2026-06-13vs Sandbaggers AnonymousWon 20
W#1 DoublesMichelle DaCosta / Ruth Lawson vs Katie Delgado / Courtney O'Daniel7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesChelsea Horan / Kirstin Clark vs Sara Thompson / Gabriela Garcia6-2, 6-3
2026-06-12vs Sandbaggers AnonymousWon 21
W#1 DoublesChelsea Horan / Ruth Lawson vs Katie Delgado / Elizabeth Flint6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesShelly Works / Danielle Spencer vs Laila Leist-Alston / Stacey Boebel1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesAllison Byrnes / Virginia Kaklamani vs Claudia Samaniego / KELLY COOPER7-6, 6-3
2026-06-12vs Sandbaggers AnonymousWon 21
W#1 DoublesChelsea Horan / Kirstin Clark vs Catherine Babbitt / Laila Leist-Alston6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesShelly Works / Danielle Spencer vs Courtney O'Daniel / Sara Thompson6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAllison Byrnes / Alexandria Vafadari vs Jessey Martinez / Diana Riechel4-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 9.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.37 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.96
Chelsea Horan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.67
Michelle DaCosta
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.45
Lauren Villegas
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.37
Ruth Lawson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Beverly Rowland
published 4.5
4.22
Virginia Kaklamani
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.12
Danielle Spencer
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.10
Alexandria Vafadari
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.06
Kirstin Clark
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Shelly Works
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Danielle Spencer + Ruth Lawson9554% games−6.9% vs expected
Danielle Spencer + Lauren Villegas314 matchesnot enough data
Danielle Spencer + Virginia Kaklamani134 matchesnot enough data
Michelle DaCosta + Chelsea Horan314 matchesnot enough data
Chelsea Horan + Ruth Lawson404 matchesnot enough data
Shelly Works + Danielle Spencer213 matchesnot enough data
Michelle DaCosta + Ruth Lawson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Chelsea Horan
22W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.96
Michelle DaCosta
15W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.67
Lauren Villegas
29W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
4.45
Ruth Lawson
30W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
4.37
4.5
Beverly Rowland
9W–9L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Virginia Kaklamani
13W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
4.22
4.5
Danielle Spencer
27W–21L career · 5 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
4.12
4.5
Alexandria Vafadari
21W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
4.10
Kirstin Clark
44W–18L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%32%68%
4.06
Shelly Works
8W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.