Teams

A55 7.0W MV Gustafson

2026 NEOTA Adult 55 & Over Spring · NEOTA A55&O 7.0 Women Spring

13 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-04-15vs A55 7.0W AVB KeroskySplit 11
W#1 DoublesKaren Cipriani / Mary Wilburn vs Dina Hopps / Pamela Hudson6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKristin Chuko / Yuping Wu vs Susan Aey / Judith Pallante5-7, 3-6
2026-04-08vs A55 7.0W CV2 HoferLost 12
W#1 DoublesJanice Schmitt / Mary Wilburn vs Liz O'Neil / Amy Shepard6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesElyse Gustafson / Karen Cipriani vs Candace Kelly / Kristin Hofer2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Grable / Kate OHara vs Laurie McCormack / Karen Witt1-6, 0-6
2026-04-01vs A55 7.0W PW1 BlesiLost 12
L#1 DoublesCheryl Kanetsky / Mary Wilburn vs Paige Knapp / Sheryl Martin7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKaren Cipriani / Elyse Gustafson vs Jennifer Atkinson / Karen Lanigan4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKristin Chuko / Kate OHara vs Renda Little / Susan Olson6-2, 6-3
2026-03-18vs A55 7.0W PW2 ReidWon 21
W#1 DoublesKaren Cipriani / Mary Wilburn vs Pamela Lucey / Linda Springer6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesElyse Gustafson / Janice Schmitt vs Ann Dewerth / Jeanne MacKay4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesYulia Lyublinski / Jennifer Grable vs Nancy Koehler / Katherine Reid7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2026-03-11vs A55 7.0W CV1 AdamsWon 21
W#1 DoublesMary Wilburn / Karen Cipriani vs Kitty Finelli / Kelly Bissetta7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKristin Chuko / Kate OHara vs Laura Simmons / Katy Donohue6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesElyse Gustafson / Yuping Wu vs Stephanie Levine / Nancy Adams2-6, 5-7
2026-03-04vs A55 7.0W PW1 BlesiLost 02
L#1 DoublesKaren Cipriani / Janice Schmitt vs Jennifer Atkinson / Sheryl Martin6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesElyse Gustafson / Mary Wilburn vs Paige Knapp / Carol Richardson1-6, 4-6
2026-02-18vs A55 7.0W NR GallagherWon 21
L#1 DoublesLynn Sands / Carol Feltoon vs Irene Slattery / Jennifer Marcie2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKate OHara / Kristin Chuko vs Mary Partridge / Lisa Gallagher7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJennifer Grable / Yulia Lyublinski vs Vanessa Furrer / Julie Kelly6-4, 6-3
2026-02-11vs A55 7.0W CV2 HoferLost 12
W#1 DoublesLynn Sands / Cheryl Kanetsky vs Liz O'Neil / Amy Shepard7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMary Wilburn / Elyse Gustafson vs Karen Witt / Susan Overholt3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesYulia Lyublinski / Jennifer Grable vs Kim Shepherd / Laura Weyenberg4-6, 0-6
2026-02-04vs A55 7.0W BA SilversteinWon 30
W#1 DoublesLynn Sands / Cheryl Kanetsky vs Marla Silverstein / Bridget Pavlish6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesKristin Chuko / Jennifer Grable vs Julie Brubaker / Pam Nelson6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesKaren Cipriani / Maureen Kelly vs Laura Siddiq / Holli Blazey6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · NEOTA A55&O 7.0 Women Spring
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1A55 7.0W CV2 Hofer73181229247
2A55 7.0W PW1 Blesi64191129266
3A55 7.0W NR Gallagher64181229250
4A55 7.0W AVB Kerosky55151530270
5A55 7.0W MV Gustafson55141635288
6A55 7.0W BA Silverstein55141637293
7A55 7.0W CV1 Adams37121842297
8A55 7.0W PW2 Reid37102046324

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Yulia Lyublinski
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Karen Cipriani
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published
3.33
Cheryl Kanetsky
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Mary Wilburn
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.25
Kristin Chuko
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published
3.20
Lynn Sands
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Karen McLeod
published
2.96
Yuping Wu
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.91
Janice Schmitt
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.89
Elyse Gustafson
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Carol Feltoon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Kate OHara
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.63
Jennifer Grable
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cheryl Kanetsky + Lynn Sands7261% games+8.5% vs expected
Elyse Gustafson + Kristin Chuko12855% games+4.4% vs expected
Mary Wilburn + Cheryl Kanetsky7558% games+3.7% vs expected
Janice Schmitt + Mary Wilburn6352% games−0.1% vs expected
Elyse Gustafson + Yulia Lyublinski8752% games−4.4% vs expected
Karen Cipriani + Elyse Gustafson4351% games−8.3% vs expected
Elyse Gustafson + Cheryl Kanetsky3347% games−8.4% vs expected
Cheryl Kanetsky + Yulia Lyublinski7158% games−9.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Yulia Lyublinski
130W–75L career · 3 lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
3.47
Karen Cipriani
88W–69L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
3.46
3.5
Cheryl Kanetsky
114W–79L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
Mary Wilburn
67W–62L career · 7 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
Kristin Chuko
216W–143L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%3%97%
3.25
Lynn Sands
48W–30L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.20
Karen McLeod
54W–87L career · no lines in 2026
46%54%<1%
3.02
Yuping Wu
45W–31L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
2.96
Janice Schmitt
57W–76L career · 3 lines in 2026
75%25%<1%
2.91
Elyse Gustafson
105W–128L career · 6 lines in 2026
79%21%<1%
2.89
3
Carol Feltoon
13W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Kate OHara
43W–51L career · 4 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.69
Jennifer Grable
32W–41L career · 5 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
2.63

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.